Processed: Re: Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 366370 important Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 366370 important thanks On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:05:44AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:02:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Is there any progress on this bug? This is currently among the issues > > blocking us from having an installable desktop task for a

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-30 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:45:25AM -0700, Arias Hung wrote: > On Tue, 09 May 2006, Sjoerd Simons delivered in simple text monotype: > > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:57:13PM -0700, Arias Hung wrote: > >>On Mon, 08 May 2006, Sjoerd Simons delivered in simple text monotype: > >> > >Uhm, right the runn

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-29 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:02:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Is there any progress on this bug? This is currently among the issues > blocking us from having an installable desktop task for amd64 in sarge, > since there are currently no hal binaries at all in testing for this > architecture.

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi folks, Is there any progress on this bug? This is currently among the issues blocking us from having an installable desktop task for amd64 in sarge, since there are currently no hal binaries at all in testing for this architecture. It would also be nice if people wouldn't take bug discussions

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-09 Thread Arias Hung
On Tue, 09 May 2006, Sjoerd Simons delivered in simple text monotype: On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:57:13PM -0700, Arias Hung wrote: On Mon, 08 May 2006, Sjoerd Simons delivered in simple text monotype: Uhm, right the runner dies.. that's bad.. Could you do the following: $ echo '#!/bin/sh\n /u

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-09 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:57:13PM -0700, Arias Hung wrote: > On Mon, 08 May 2006, Sjoerd Simons delivered in simple text monotype: > > >># hald --daemon=yes --verbose=yes > >>17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:469: hal 0.5.7 > >>17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:478: Will daemonize > >>17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:479: Be

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-08 Thread Arias Hung
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Sjoerd Simons delivered in simple text monotype: # hald --daemon=yes --verbose=yes 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:469: hal 0.5.7 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:478: Will daemonize 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:479: Becoming a daemon What happens if you run with --daemon=no --verbose=yes ? <-

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-08 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:52:07PM -0700, Arias Hung wrote: > Package: hal > Version: 0.5.7-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > hald dies upon startup despite stating that it's becoming a daemon: > > # hald --daemon=yes --verbose=yes > 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:469: ha

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

2006-05-07 Thread Arias Hung
Package: hal Version: 0.5.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable hald dies upon startup despite stating that it's becoming a daemon: # hald --daemon=yes --verbose=yes 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:469: hal 0.5.7 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:478: Will daemonize 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:4