Bug#360690: [FTBFS] install scripts do not run; package seems mangled

2006-04-21 Thread Tim Peeler
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:28:28PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > > "Stephen" == Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stephen> The main problem was lost +x perms, most likely due to > Stephen> patch, and me not noticing that the x bit was lost before > Stephen> uplo

Bug#360690: [FTBFS] install scripts do not run; package seems mangled

2006-04-20 Thread Joe Mason
Stephen Gran wrote: > The main problem was lost +x perms, most likely due to patch, and me > not noticing that the x bit was lost before upload. I don't know that > wholesale reversion of packaging decisions is a good thing to do in > an NMU. > No, adding the +x perms and running the script man

Bug#360690: [FTBFS] install scripts do not run; package seems mangled

2006-04-20 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Arnaud Fontaine said: > Hello, > > Attached is the diff for my webcalendar 1.0.2-2.1 NMU. Thanks to Julien > Danjou, Raphaël Hertzog and Gustavo Franco for their help. This looks wrong in several ways. Please hold off the NMU just a little longer. > diff -urN webca

Bug#360690: [FTBFS] install scripts do not run; package seems mangled

2006-04-20 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
> "Stephen" == Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephen> The main problem was lost +x perms, most likely due to Stephen> patch, and me not noticing that the x bit was lost before Stephen> upload. I don't know that wholesale reversion of packaging Stephen> decisi

Bug#360690: [FTBFS] install scripts do not run; package seems mangled

2006-04-20 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
tags 360690 + patch fixed thanks Hello, Attached is the diff for my webcalendar 1.0.2-2.1 NMU. Thanks to Julien Danjou, Raphaël Hertzog and Gustavo Franco for their help. Regards, Arnaud Fontaine diff -urN webcalendar-1.0.2.old/debian/changelog webcalendar-1.0.2/debian/changelog --- webcalenda