On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:37:01AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
> >> I'm doing an NMU of xastir to fix #352371; diff attached.
> >
> > OK. I think one week delay for an otherwise active maint
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
>> I'm doing an NMU of xastir to fix #352371; diff attached.
>
> OK. I think one week delay for an otherwise active maintainer is a bit
> quick but otherwise I have no objection.
Sorry if I st
Hi Matej,
OK. I think one week delay for an otherwise active maintainer is a bit
quick but otherwise I have no objection.
urgency=medium also seems unjustified?
Thanks,
Hamish
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm doing an NMU of xastir to fix #352371; d
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of xastir to fix #352371; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u xastir-1.8.0/debian/changelog xastir-1.8.0/debian/changelog
--- xastir-1.8.0/debian/changelog
+++ xastir-1.8.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xastir (1.8.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * NMU.
+ * Up
4 matches
Mail list logo