Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-02-18 Thread Bruce Korb
Daniel Schepler wrote: Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit : Daniel Schepler wrote: I got: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000 (is 0) THANK YOU. I now have complete confidence that adding 1 (one) to the initial mmap fix

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-02-03 Thread Daniel Schepler
Le Vendredi 03 Février 2006 07:06, Matt Kraai a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:01:02AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: > > Oops. Yes, that's right. Nevertheless, alpha had the same issue, only > > more reliably. As soon as I have a round tuit, I'll make a check on an > > alpha I was just granted

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-02-02 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:01:02AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: > Daniel Schepler wrote: > > >Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit : > > > > > >>Daniel Schepler wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I got: > >>> > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test > >>>Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-02-02 Thread Bruce Korb
Daniel Schepler wrote: Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit : Daniel Schepler wrote: I got: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000 (is 0) THANK YOU. I now have complete confidence that adding 1 (one) to the initial mmap fix

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-02-01 Thread Daniel Schepler
Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit : > Daniel Schepler wrote: > >I got: > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test > >Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000 (is 0) > > THANK YOU. I now have complete confidence that adding 1 (one) to the > initial mmap fixes the mmap issues on th

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-01-27 Thread Bruce Korb
Matt Kraai wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: Le Vendredi 27 Janvier 2006 16:14, Matt Kraai a écrit : On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I don't know what'

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-01-27 Thread Daniel Schepler
Le Vendredi 27 Janvier 2006 16:14, Matt Kraai a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I > > don't know what's different. > > Would you please compile and run the attached program on your sy

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-01-27 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Le Vendredi 27 Janvier 2006 16:14, Matt Kraai a écrit : > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > > I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I > > > don't know what's differ

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-01-27 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I don't > know what's different. Would you please compile and run the attached program on your system and let me know what the result is? -- Matt #include #in

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-01-27 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > I'm still getting FTBFS of autogen under pbuilder with version 1:5.8.1-3 on > i386; from my build log: > > ... [...] > FAIL: license.test Thanks for reproducing the problem. > I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-01-27 Thread Daniel Schepler
I'm still getting FTBFS of autogen under pbuilder with version 1:5.8.1-3 on i386; from my build log: ... ++ lo_dir=/tmp/buildd/autogen-5.8.1/autoopts ++ test -d /tmp/buildd/autogen-5.8.1/autoopts/.libs ++ lo_dir=/tmp/buildd/autogen-5.8.1/autoopts/.libs ++ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/buildd/autogen-5.8.1/