Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 339691 -1
Bug#339691: vacation does not wait for its sendmail child
Bug 339691 cloned as bug 339749.
> reassign -1 maildrop
Bug#339749: vacation does not wait for its sendmail child
Bug reassigned from package `vacation' t
clone 339691 -1
reassign -1 maildrop
retitle -1 maildrop: kills processes it shouldn't
severity 339691 normal
thanks
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:44:26AM +0100, Vlada Macek wrote:
> [At 18.11.2005 08:23, Steve Langasek kindly sent the following quotation.]
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:17:43AM +01
On Nov 18, Vlada Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know whether the package maintainer is viable (there is at least
> one other serious bug for vacation), but I plead for fixing this bug. It
I plan to finish my pending vacation update, some day.
But people should really stop using autores
[At 18.11.2005 08:23, Steve Langasek kindly sent the following quotation.]
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:17:43AM +0100, Vlada Macek wrote:
>
>> Vacation does not wait for its sendmail child to die in any way and
>> exits!
>
>> Therefore accurate vacation parent (such as maildrop MDA) wipes
>> forke
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:17:43AM +0100, Vlada Macek wrote:
> Vacation does not wait for its sendmail child to die in any way and exits!
> Therefore accurate vacation parent (such as maildrop MDA) wipes forked
> and executed sendmail before it could send any message...
Huh? Why is that a reason
Package: vacation
Version: 3.3.0
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Vacation does not wait for its sendmail child to die in any way and exits!
Therefore accurate vacation parent (such as maildrop MDA) wipes forked
and executed sendmail before it could send any message...
Also multiple events that deser
6 matches
Mail list logo
