Hi all,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:36:37PM +1000, Matt Flax wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes I was thinking about removing it from the Debian release system.
>
> What about you Paul ?
I have sent a private email with Christian. I am still hoping that he
changes the README file in the CVS. Let's give him a
OK - no worries,
I will hang tight to hear if Chris replies to you Paul.
Matt
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:58:44AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:36:37PM +1000, Matt Flax wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > yes I was thinking about removing it from the Debian release sys
Hello Matt,
Have you thought about what to do about the linux sampler license
problem, bug #328121 [0]?
--
Clear skies,
Justin
References
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328121
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:31:30AM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
> It has come to my attention that released Linuxsampler versions up to
> the latest release 0.3.3 are licensed purely under the GPL. The
> "NON COMMERCIAL"-exception has been added to the cvs version and is
> reflected on the homepage
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:50:12 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot be in main, but
> could be in non-free maybe.
It has come to my attention that released Linuxsampler versions up to
the latest release 0.3.3 are licensed purely under the GPL
> That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot
> be in main, but could be in non-free maybe.
No, this is really an additional restriction over the GPL, thus
rendering the software undistributable for everyone but the
original author.
--
HTH,
massa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I have contacted the author and am waiting to see whether he will change
the license. If not then we will either remove or move it to non-free.
Matt
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:50:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:03:46AM +0300, Harri J?rvi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 200
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:03:46AM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 16:26:15 +0200, Göran Weinholt wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
>
> > > In addition there's a conflict between linuxsampler's aim to be an
> > > opensource software, and th
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 16:26:15 +0200, Göran Weinholt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
> > In addition there's a conflict between linuxsampler's aim to be an
> > opensource software, and the license used. Restricting commercial use
> > makes the software nonop
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that the README in linuxsampler says the following thing:
>
> "This software is distributed under the GNU General Public License (see
> COPYING file), and may not be used in commercial applications without
> asking
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:02:43PM -0400, pryzbyj wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri J?rvi wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Linuxsampler is packaged in debian unstable.
> >
> > It would seem to me that Linuxsampler currently is not compatible with
> > DFSG.
> Agree.
> I'm filing a
11 matches
Mail list logo
