On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:38:56AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote:
> This isn't djview's fault, is it?
Nope, you can blame this one on me. The dependency was forced in order
to get the GNOME 2.10 package into testing so that we can get unstable
unwedged. djview's uninstallability is an unfortuna
Yes, it probably has to do with that.
Will look into a transitional package. But although it might solve
the multiple libdjvulibre1 vs multiple libdjvulibre15 problem, it
probably won't solve this libqt* issue.
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Sure, but there is an automated system that does the
unstable-to-testing migration. Don't know why it failed here.
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:11:49AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote:
> Sure, but there is an automated system that does the
> unstable-to-testing migration.
Ah, I see. Maybe it has something to do with the incompatibility of
libdjvulibre1 and libdjvulibre15 (bug #327190)? The apt-get
dist-upgrade
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:38:56AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote:
> This isn't djview's fault, is it?
Shouldn't djview have remained in unstable as long as some of its
dependencies were still there? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the working
of Debian distributions, but surely migration must proceed
This isn't djview's fault, is it?
I'll wait, and close this bug once libqt3-mt migrates into testing.
--
Barak A. Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hamilton Institute & Dept Comp Sci, NUI Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
http://www-bcl.cs.nuim.ie/~barak/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: djview
Version: 3.5.15-1
Severity: serious
djview version 3.5.15-1 found in "testing" depends on libqt3-mt which
is only available in "unstable". This is broken:
vega david ~ $ sudo apt-get -s install djview
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages co
7 matches
Mail list logo
