On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:28:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on
> another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So
> why not file it for libc6?
What cpu type is that other machine? I assume that ska is a 040?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 327780 m68k
Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k
Warning: Unknown package 'm68k'
Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `m68k'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
reassign 327780 m68k
thanks
that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on
another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So
why not file it for libc6?
The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask,
if it's time to drop m68k from the re
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Script started on Mon Sep 12 08:22:21 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /home/wouter~$ cat >foo.c
int main() {
;
return 0;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Segmentation fault
[EMA
4 matches
Mail list logo