Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-12 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 03:03:02AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > will libcurl3 with versioned symbols break existing packages linked > > to it? > > It will not. good > It would be best to coordinate with upstream to get symb

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > will libcurl3 with versioned symbols break existing packages linked > to it? It will not. It would be best to coordinate with upstream to get symbol versioning added there as well, so that binaries built against the symbol-versi

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-12 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:46:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mind you, the license/OpenSSLCallback conflict neccessarily > > segregates the packages into two camps, those which are GPL, and > > those which need the callback only suppli

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-11 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> It is *absolutely intolerable* to declare such conflicts for shared >> libraries, where there are easy solutions: MAKE TWO LIBRARIES THAT >> HAVE DIFFERENT NAMES. > > The package has to bui

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-11 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:54:17AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > It is *absolutely intolerable* to declare such conflicts for shared > > > libraries, where there are easy solutions:

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-11 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:54:17AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > It is *absolutely intolerable* to declare such conflicts for shared > > libraries, where there are easy solutions: MAKE TWO LIBRARIES THAT > > HAVE DIFFERENT NAMES. >

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-11 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > It is *absolutely intolerable* to declare such conflicts for shared > libraries, where there are easy solutions: MAKE TWO LIBRARIES THAT > HAVE DIFFERENT NAMES. The package has to build libraries with differently versioned symbols as well, to avoid

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

2005-09-10 Thread Otavio Salvador
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There should be TWO libcurls, with DIFFERENT names, and then > applications can simply link against whichever one they want, instead > of the current approach, which totally breaks, violates policy, and > doesn't really help much of anyone. I real