Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-19 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Tue, 19 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > > lam is linked statically against mpich. But libmpich++ is shipped with > > lam and lam builds and links against that. That is bad and incorrect but > > subject of another yet-to-file bug. > > Whoa ? LAM is linked against mpich ? Aren't they tw

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 18 juillet 2005 à 23:38 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit : > Hello! > > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the > > mpich version seems to be statically linked to libpmpich++. I'll see if > > I have time for these.

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-18 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the > mpich version seems to be statically linked to libpmpich++. I'll see if > I have time for these. lam is linked statically against mpich. But libmpich++ is shipped with lam a

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 15 juillet 2005 à 10:03 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit : > > Hello! > > > > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the > > > mpich version seem

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2005 à 10:03 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit : > Hello! > > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the > > mpich version seems to be statically linked to libpmpich++. I'll see if > > I have time for thes

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-15 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the > mpich version seems to be statically linked to libpmpich++. I'll see if > I have time for these. A new mpich is in the NEW queue. I'm not sure it's correct though. http://q

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 14 juillet 2005 à 12:47 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit : > Hello! > > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Please don't! It is ready on y side, but I have to wait for lam4 to be > > rebuilt. > > NMU lam4! On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the mp

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-14 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > Please don't! It is ready on y side, but I have to wait for lam4 to be > rebuilt. Ok. Robert. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-14 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > Please don't! It is ready on y side, but I have to wait for lam4 to be > rebuilt. NMU lam4! Robert. -- A language that doesn't have everything is actually easier to program in than some that do. -- Dennis M. Ritchie

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 22:40 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit : > Package: hdf5 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > I plan on NMUing hdf5 for the CXX transition today. Please don't! It is ready on y side, but I have to wait for lam4 to be rebuilt. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette

Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition

2005-07-13 Thread Robert Jordens
Package: hdf5 Severity: serious Tags: patch I plan on NMUing hdf5 for the CXX transition today. See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html The idea is from here: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11748 I will attach a patch as soon as I have this