On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:18:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]:
> > > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
> > > >terminal descriptions
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:18:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]:
> >
> > > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
> > > >terminal descript
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]:
>
> > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
> > >terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits
> > >them. Instead, they sh
#include
* Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]:
> >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
> >terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits
> >them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to
> >/etc/terminfo/... sh
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Hello,
I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits
them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to
/etc/terminfo/... should be created, so
Hello,
I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled
terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits
them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to
/etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a
chance to modif
6 matches
Mail list logo
