Bug#306840: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:24:03AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > > Anyway, I've approved -6 to go into sarge, so there's no need to email > > debian-release about it. > thanks, uh, wait, it was -7 that fixed the problem. Right, thanks for catching me -- I looked at the right version, and appr

Bug#306840: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-05 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello Steve On 2005-05-04 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > > I'm currently preparing a new upload to unstable which has SNMP disabled > > and an explanation about the reasons as well as a small hint how to > > compile it oneself in README

Bug#306840: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > I'm currently preparing a new upload to unstable which has SNMP disabled > and an explanation about the reasons as well as a small hint how to > compile it oneself in README.Debian. Everything else is post-sarge > stuff. Hi Chris

Bug#306840: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-04 Thread Christian Hammers
tags 306840 + pending thanks I'm currently preparing a new upload to unstable which has SNMP disabled and an explanation about the reasons as well as a small hint how to compile it oneself in README.Debian. Everything else is post-sarge stuff. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Bug#306840: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-03 Thread Christian Hammers
reopen 306840 severity 306840 serious tags 306840 + needhelp thanks Ok, linking against libsnmp5 reintroduces dynamic linking against OpenSSL regardless on whether or not I deactivate it in Quagga itself. As Quagga is GPL this is, to my understanding even in this indirect way, an incompatible lice