Sebastien Bacher wrote:
(please keep the bug in the Cc:, I've forwarded the previous mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Le jeudi 31 mars 2005 à 12:20 +0200, Marek W. Gutowski a écrit :
So, indeed, there is something under /usr/local/lib, but,
frankly, I didn't put it there 'by hand'.
The debian package
--- Begin Message ---
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le jeudi 31 mars 2005 à 11:19 +0200, Marek W. Gutowski a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
This is certainly caused by a locally installed, older version of glib.
I have enough of these stupid bug reports. Why do users keep installing
local versions j
Le jeudi 31 mars 2005 à 11:19 +0200, Marek W. Gutowski a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >
> > This is certainly caused by a locally installed, older version of glib.
> >
> > I have enough of these stupid bug reports. Why do users keep installing
> > local versions just to fuck up their syst
Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
This is certainly caused by a locally installed, older version of glib.
I have enough of these stupid bug reports. Why do users keep installing
local versions just to fuck up their system?
I understand your irritation, but look below:
gutow:/home/gutow# dpkg -l glib*
Desi
Le mercredi 30 mars 2005 Ã 19:03 +0200, Marek W. Gutowski a Ãcrit :
> Package: libgtk2.0-bin
> Version: 2.6.2-4
> Severity: grave
>gnumeric: relocation error: /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined
> symbol: g_option_context_new
>
> The file mentioned above (/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Package: libgtk2.0-bin
Version: 2.6.2-4
Severity: grave
*** Please type your report below this line ***
This is what I see since some time, when trying to upgrade Debian packages:
gutow:/home/gutow# apt-get install --reinstall libgtk2.0-bin
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tr
6 matches
Mail list logo
