Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.01.1317 +0200]: > -if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ] && [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then > +if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then > > I wonder if this change is correct for a udev fix. I do not have the mental capacity after this day to judge it, but vorlon took ca

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

(Sending this from work, so sorry for breaking thread and I have now idea how formatting will turn out...) -if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ] && [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then +if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then I wonder if this change is correct for a udev fix. IIRC "-e /dev/.devfsd" checks for _devfsd_, not ude

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I believe a failure to upgrade while udev is installed is serious. > Please lower again (and sorry for bothering the busy release team then) > if I am for some reason mistaken. I agree that this is an RC bug, and I've just uploa