Hi,
Thanks to everyone for their helpful responses.
> BTW, about which KDE version do we talk? Is it enough if we change the
> license in CVS HEAD aka KDE 4 (maybe 3.5)?
If a license change is likely, I would be most appreciative if the
change could be made in KDE_3_3_BRANCH also (since it app
As a minor contributor too, you also have my permission to dual-license
Cervisia with GPL, that's okay with me.
Shaheed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 25 February 2005 03:30, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Currently cervisia is licensed under the QPL. As the maintainer of
> kdesdk in debian, I am unfortunately faced with having to remove
> cervisia from the debian distribution since the QPL does not meet
> with debian's free software guid
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 14:39 schrieb Richard Moore:
> I did the KDE 3 port of cervisia (kpartifying etc.), and the CVS
> import. I'm not really interested in licenses. If others want to
> dual-license my parts of the code with GPL that's fine I personally
> couldn't care less. I'm equally unb
I did the KDE 3 port of cervisia (kpartifying etc.), and the CVS
import. I'm not really interested in licenses. If others want to
dual-license my parts of the code with GPL that's fine I personally
couldn't care less. I'm equally unbothered if Debian remove it (though
I do wonder if the final relea
Hi.
Currently cervisia is licensed under the QPL. As the maintainer of
kdesdk in debian, I am unfortunately faced with having to remove
cervisia from the debian distribution since the QPL does not meet with
debian's free software guidelies. Of course this is debian's decision,
but nevertheless
6 matches
Mail list logo
