> > + UPDATE_INETD_ARG_EXTRA="stream tcp nowait root
> > /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/imapd"
>
> Whoops - seems you hardcode imapd values for both uw-imapd and ipopd
> (both here and other places). :-(
>
> I'd appreciate if you will look through it again. Else I will take a
> look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-02-2005 18:23, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>Have been too busy with real life to dig into the problem myself, but
>>will appreciate a patch and package it.
Well - off course I won't package it unless it looks sane...
> the patch is inspired by
> I have been listening on the sideline, and really appreciate the good
> input on this.
great :)
> Have been too busy with real life to dig into the problem myself, but
> will appreciate a patch and package it.
well, then a patch is attached.
it is a patch against the tree built by the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-02-2005 19:46, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Ven 25 Février 2005 17:32, Frank Küster a écrit :
>
>>Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
>>>
- : this is really not trivial : inetd
Le Ven 25 Février 2005 17:32, Frank Küster a écrit :
> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
> >> - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by
> >> categories, and it will be really difficult to put the entries at
> >> the ri
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
>> - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories,
>> and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right
>> place in the postinst
>
> In fact, is not ve
* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
> - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories,
> and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right
> place in the postinst
In fact, is not very difficult, since you just feed update-inetd the
> possibly as a result of DEBIAN/postinst:
I was misleaded by this line
in fact, the bug is triggered by the postrm that does not check if the
package is actually beeing upgraded or not.
here are two correct postrm (you only need to put them in place of the
previous ones), that will correc
8 matches
Mail list logo
