Matt,
[For the record, I don't directly receive mails sent to knoda bugs, please
cc me if you want to continue this discussion]
> OK, I understand now. It seems to me that this requirement should be
> encoded into the knoda binary's dependencies.
It is not normal practice to use versioned depen
>> On Fri Feb 4 04:45:57 2005 -0500, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> ii libhk-kdeclasses6 0.7-1 visual widget library for database
P> This package is part of the knoda sources. You have to upgrade
P> everything to make the bug disappear.
OK, I understand now.
OK, I'll try it -- but then doesn't knoda have an incorrect
dependency, or shouldn't this bug be reassigned? I guess you've taken
care of that with the sarge tag. Don't bother replying -- you seem to
know exactly what's going on, and that's all I wanted to ensure. I
saw "fixed in 0.7.2" and it
Am Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 22:46 schrieb Matt Swift:
> I reopened this bug because of the following:
> [beth] debian# knoda
> knoda: relocation error: /usr/lib/libhk_kdeclasses.so.6: undefined
> symbol: _ZN16hk_dsmodevisible15set_has_changedEv [beth] debian#
> ii libhk-kdeclasses6
tags 291027 sarge
thanks
Matt,
> I reopened this bug because of the following:
> [beth] debian# dpkg -s knoda
> Package: knoda
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: kde
> Installed-Size: 696
> Maintainer: Mike Schacht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
I reopened this bug because of the following:
[beth] debian# dpkg -s knoda
Package: knoda
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: kde
Installed-Size: 696
Maintainer: Mike Schacht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.7.2-1
Depen
6 matches
Mail list logo