Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> What can be done for bug #230677? It was a year since an NMU was done
> (march 2004). The problem is fixed.
>
> But since it was fixed by the NMU, it's still open as RC bug, and the
> package won't go to sarge.
>
> I think the bug should be closed.
You're right. I noticed that bug after I sent the mail.
Well, I'll try someone to help with another NMU, since bug #282274 is just
a small fix in the build-depeneds lines of the package.
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:16:04AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
>> What can be done for bug #230677? It was a y
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:16:04AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> What can be done for bug #230677? It was a year since an NMU was done
> (march 2004). The problem is fixed.
> But since it was fixed by the NMU, it's still open as RC bug, and the
> package won't go to sarge.
> I think the bug should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
What can be done for bug #230677? It was a year since an NMU was done
(march 2004). The problem is fixed.
But since it was fixed by the NMU, it's still open as RC bug, and the
package won't go to sarge.
I think the bug should be closed. What do
4 matches
Mail list logo
