Bug#1070446: rocm-hipamd: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38

2024-07-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-07-18 11:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > With glibc 2.39, the revert is not possible anymore, therefore I > rocm-hipamd FTBFS again. I have therefore upgraded the severity to > serious. > > Emanuele Rocca is working on a solution on the upstream LLVM side. In > the meantime we might have

Bug#1070446: rocm-hipamd: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38

2024-07-18 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2024-05-06 23:14, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > glibc 2.38 introduced changes to the bits/math-vector.h file on arm64 in > order to support math vector functions. This unfortunately caused the > FTBFS of your packages. > > The change has been temporarily reverted in versio

Bug#1070446: rocm-hipamd: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38

2024-05-05 Thread Cordell Bloor
Tags: patch Hi Graham, On 2024-05-05 07:31, Graham Inggs wrote: As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], rocm-hipamd FTBFS on arm64 with glibc 2.38. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. A bug was filed against glibc [2], but it seems glibc upstream do not consider

Bug#1070446: rocm-hipamd: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38

2024-05-05 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: rocm-hipamd Version: 5.7.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], rocm-hipamd FTBFS on arm64 with glibc 2.38. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. A bug was filed against glibc [2], but it seems glibc upstream d