Bug#1069959: libcbor FTBFS on hppa and mips to due different NaN encoding

2024-09-15 Thread Vincent Bernat
I have temporarily pushed Helge's patch until this is solved upstream. On 2024-09-11 17:01, Bo YU wrote: Hi, Sorry for jumping into this topic. Is there anything I can do to push for updates to this package? Becasue the package blocked debci team to create riscv64/testing chroot on our riscv6

Bug#1069959: libcbor FTBFS on hppa and mips to due different NaN encoding

2024-09-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi On 2024-09-11 23:01, Bo YU wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for jumping into this topic. > > Is there anything I can do to push for updates to this package? > > Becasue the package blocked debci team to create riscv64/testing chroot > on our riscv64 workers due to this FTBFS on mips64el lead to fail t

Bug#1069959: libcbor FTBFS on hppa and mips to due different NaN encoding

2024-09-11 Thread Bo YU
Hi, Sorry for jumping into this topic. Is there anything I can do to push for updates to this package? Becasue the package blocked debci team to create riscv64/testing chroot on our riscv64 workers due to this FTBFS on mips64el lead to fail to migrate. On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:33:28AM +0200,

Bug#1069959: libcbor FTBFS on hppa and mips to due different NaN encoding

2024-08-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2024-05-03 22:26, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Hello Helge, > > Couldn't the patch be pushed upstream? And maybe there should be an else > branch with the encoding of the other NaN? > I am not sure the patch is upstreamable. It basically disables the test on mips and hppa, which is fine for D