Control: severity ! important
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:24:25PM +0200, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote:
> Le 11/04/2023 à 23:52, Florian Schlichting a écrit :
> > […]
> > I think we should take a step back and think about how a freshly
> > installed mpd package should look like. I think it may actual
Le 11/04/2023 à 23:52, Florian Schlichting a écrit :
[…]
I think we should take a step back and think about how a freshly
installed mpd package should look like. I think it may actually be a
feature that the system mpd.service is not enabled and started on a
fresh install. On most desktop/lapt
I'm AFK this week so won't be able to do an upload either. I agree that putting
the unit files where systemd.pc says they should go is probably the right thing
to do. However it feels nonsensical to move files from /usr/lib to /lib only so
they can be moved back by the /usr-merge; reading #10316
On 4/11/23 17:57, Max Kellermann wrote:
On 2023/04/11 17:40, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
I think 2 is better myself and I'm attaching a proof of concept
debdiff to implement it. (You might want to make a cleaner version.)
Agree. I think your patch looks quite clean, and if it were submitted
to
On 2023/04/11 17:40, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I think 2 is better myself and I'm attaching a proof of concept
> debdiff to implement it. (You might want to make a cleaner version.)
Agree. I think your patch looks quite clean, and if it were submitted
to me, I'd merge it (the same would probab
Hello Max Kellermann,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2023/04/11 15:11, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > The culprit seems to be that mpd falls back on hard-coded path (instead
> > of failing) when systemd.pc is not found!
>
> What does this have to do with syst
On 2023/04/11 15:11, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The culprit seems to be that mpd falls back on hard-coded path (instead
> of failing) when systemd.pc is not found!
What does this have to do with systemd.pc? It isn't used anywhere.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:37:27AM +0200, bi...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: mpd
> Version: 0.23.12-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bookworm
> User: debhel...@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: systemd-files-in-usr-bookworm
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> It seems that your package mpd is shipping f
Package: mpd
Version: 0.23.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debhel...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: systemd-files-in-usr-bookworm
Dear Maintainer,
It seems that your package mpd is shipping files (.service, .socket or
.timer) in /usr/lib/systemd/system.
This is not supported
9 matches
Mail list logo
