Hi,
> > Thanks a lot but looks like the fix was not complete.
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029908
> >
> > Can you upload a version with the fix available in the bug report?
>
> Done. This time I merged the commit from your repo on Salsa, and also
> ran the autopkg
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:12:15PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The update looks good to me and a rebuild of rdeps with ratt was
> > successful. Or more precisely, was successful for the packages that
> > also build against 5.12.1. So I have just uploaded to the archive.
>
> Thanks
Hi,
> The update looks good to me and a rebuild of rdeps with ratt was
> successful. Or more precisely, was successful for the packages that
> also build against 5.12.1. So I have just uploaded to the archive.
Thanks a lot but looks like the fix was not complete.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:55:09PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjna-java/
>
> My commits are available at: https://salsa.debian.org/niol/libjna-java/
Hi Alex,
The update looks good to me and a rebuild of rdeps with ratt was
successful. Or more precisely,
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:55:09PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared an updated package with the new upstream version.
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjna-java/
>
> My commits are available at: https://salsa.debian.org/niol/libjna-java/
I will take a look.
Hi,
I prepared an updated package with the new upstream version.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjna-java/
My commits are available at: https://salsa.debian.org/niol/libjna-java/
Thanks,
Alex
6 matches
Mail list logo
