On 2/6/23 23:23, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I can make a 0-day NMU if you don't want to upload giac.
>
> That's not a nice thing to do, but given the freeze deadline it's pretty
> urgent.
>
> cu
> Adrian
That would be great, thanks! It's team maintained, I don't think anyone will be
upset about it.
B
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:19:20PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1030687
>
> I applied the patches and confirmed that the package builds now. I can upload
> it once giac is fixed.
I can make a 0-day NMU if you don't want to upload giac.
That's not a nice thing to do, but gi
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1030687
Bug #1020576 [src:sagemath] "FTBFS with setuptools >= 64"
1020576 was blocked by: 1020436 1020456
1020576 was blocking: 1013399 1022254 1022278 1025874 1028345 1028433
Added blocking bug(s) of 1020576: 1030687
--
1020576: https://bugs.debian.org
Control: block -1 by 1030687
I applied the patches and confirmed that the package builds now. I can upload
it once giac is fixed.
Hi Rogo,
awesome, that helps a lot! Thanks for figuring all this out. I had already
started determining which patches need to be applied, but wasn't finished yet.
Could you please file a bug against giac to get the uchar issue fixed?
Best,
Tobias
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
as Adrian indicated, the setuptools issue is now fixed and the
dt-reorder-cython-setuptools-import.patch is not needed anymore.
However, there are now several unrelated problems causing sagemath to FTBFS.
First of all giac.h can't be compiled, as uchar is not defined.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1020576 [src:sagemath] "FTBFS with setuptools >= 64"
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1020576: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 09:13:35AM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>...
> Upstream has a (maybe unrelated?) problem with higher setuptools versions
> described here:
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34442
>
> Unfortunately I don't have much time to work on this. If someone can come up
> with a pat
On 12/23/22 12:56, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:07:53 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:05:07 + Tobias Hansen wrote:
>>> On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:07:53 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:05:07 + Tobias Hansen wrote:
> > On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> > >> On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > >>> Tobias, since this
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:05:07 + Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> >> On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >>> Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and
> >>> get
On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>> On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>> Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and
>>> get the ball rolling? :-)
>> Hi,
>>
>> I actually tried building with
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and
> > get the ball rolling? :-)
>
> Hi,
>
> I actually tried building with the new pari and gap versions a while ago
On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and get
> the ball rolling? :-)
Hi,
I actually tried building with the new pari and gap versions a while ago (using
sagemath 9.5 with upstream patches for the new pari and gap versions
Hi Tobias and Bill,
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:05:44 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 08:44:52AM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1020436 1020456
> >
> > Before sagemath can be fixed, cypari2 and giac have to be built against
> > pari 2.15.
There's a new re
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 08:44:52AM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1020436 1020456
>
> Before sagemath can be fixed, cypari2 and giac have to be built against pari
> 2.15.
OK, is there someone taking care of giac ?
Cheers,
--
Bill.
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Control: block -1 by 1020436 1020456
Before sagemath can be fixed, cypari2 and giac have to be built against pari
2.15.
On 10/13/22 19:08, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:55:41 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Please update sagemath so that i
17 matches
Mail list logo
