On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:33:58PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> It looks like the ppc64el build was retried and succeeded.
>
> Maybe the timeouts should be increased for slow build systems, similar
> what upstream did for running under valgrind with commit 2d12409a
> ("lib-smtp: Adjust test
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:15:40PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> It looks like the ppc64el build was retried and succeeded.
> >>
> >> Maybe the timeouts should be increased for slow build systems, similar
> >> what upstream did for running under valgrind with commit 2d12409a
> >> ("lib-smtp: Ad
On 17. Apr 2022, at 5.43, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:33:58PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
>> It looks like the ppc64el build was retried and succeeded.
>>
>> Maybe the timeouts should be increased for slow build systems, similar
>> what upstream did for running unde
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:33:58PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> It looks like the ppc64el build was retried and succeeded.
>
> Maybe the timeouts should be increased for slow build systems, similar
> what upstream did for running under valgrind with commit 2d12409a
> ("lib-smtp: Adjust test
Source: dovecot
Version: 1:2.3.18+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
dovecot FTBFS on ppc64el:
0 / 77 tests failed
slow server .. : ok
slow client
5 matches
Mail list logo