On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:06:30PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54:36AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> > Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is
> > not installed.
>
> binutils from stable does not work with libc6-dev &
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> That would happen to be 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7.
Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is
not installed.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 05:59:03AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:52PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> > After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built
> > with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happen
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.11.1-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built
with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happens
in string functions such as strrchr or strlen. The execu
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:35:03PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Would a compromise be possible? Something along the lines of doing
> urgent stuff (journal replays, checks of unclean unjournaled
> filesystems) but skipping the "n days/mounts since last check- check
> forced" checks when on batt
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-61
Severity: critical
File: /etc/init.d/checkroot.sh
Justification: causes serious data loss
I was rather horrified to watch my laptop boot with a dirty root
filesystem mounted read/write. Upon further investigation, I discovered
that checkroot.sh and checkf
../../doc/ircp.1.
After upgrading to cmake 2.6.3 (from testing), the package seems to
finish building without error, and it even contains an ircp man page.
commit 654630ea0e46a9a7028ed5eb999eaba4cb4e1aae
Author: Zygo Blaxell
Date: Fri Apr 24 18:08:34 2009 -0400
cmake 2.6.0 can't build
I've just seen similar symptoms to this bug on an upgrade of libssl0.9.8.
One difference is that I see 'exit status 128' instead of 255, but like
this bug there is no indication in the output as to cause, and the upgrade
would not complete despite restarting it several times from aptitude.
I've se
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.20.8-1.1
Severity: grave
The fglrx-driver package in the Debian archive declares a dependency on
xserver-xorg >= 6.8.0 and <= 6.8.99, but the only version of xserver-xorg
in the archive at the moment (as far as I can tell) is 6.9.0.
This makes the fglrx-driver p
9 matches
Mail list logo