Bug#586388: executables built with libc6-dev 2.11.1-3 segfault in string handling functions

2010-06-19 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:06:30PM +, Clint Adams wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54:36AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > > Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is > > not installed. > > binutils from stable does not work with libc6-dev &

Bug#586388: executables built with libc6-dev 2.11.1-3 segfault in string handling functions

2010-06-19 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > That would happen to be 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is not installed. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#586388: executables built with libc6-dev 2.11.1-3 segfault in string handling functions

2010-06-19 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 05:59:03AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:52PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > > After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built > > with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happen

Bug#586388: executables built with libc6-dev 2.11.1-3 segfault in string handling functions

2010-06-18 Thread Zygo Blaxell
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.11.1-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happens in string functions such as strrchr or strlen. The execu

Bug#526398: /etc/init.d/checkroot.sh: can cause serious data corruption if booting on, battery power

2009-05-01 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:35:03PM +0100, peter green wrote: > Would a compromise be possible? Something along the lines of doing > urgent stuff (journal replays, checks of unclean unjournaled > filesystems) but skipping the "n days/mounts since last check- check > forced" checks when on batt

Bug#526398: /etc/init.d/checkroot.sh: can cause serious data corruption if booting on battery power

2009-04-30 Thread Zygo Blaxell
Package: initscripts Version: 2.86.ds1-61 Severity: critical File: /etc/init.d/checkroot.sh Justification: causes serious data loss I was rather horrified to watch my laptop boot with a dirty root filesystem mounted read/write. Upon further investigation, I discovered that checkroot.sh and checkf

Bug#525493: libopenobex: Build-Depends on cmake > 2.6, but package won't build with cmake 2.6.0

2009-04-24 Thread Zygo Blaxell
../../doc/ircp.1. After upgrading to cmake 2.6.3 (from testing), the package seems to finish building without error, and it even contains an ircp man page. commit 654630ea0e46a9a7028ed5eb999eaba4cb4e1aae Author: Zygo Blaxell Date: Fri Apr 24 18:08:34 2009 -0400 cmake 2.6.0 can't build

Bug#445090: 445090: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255

2007-10-05 Thread Zygo Blaxell
I've just seen similar symptoms to this bug on an upgrade of libssl0.9.8. One difference is that I see 'exit status 128' instead of 255, but like this bug there is no indication in the output as to cause, and the upgrade would not complete despite restarting it several times from aptitude. I've se

Bug#355611: fglrx-driver is not installable due to dependency on xserver-org 6.8.x, which is no longer available

2006-03-06 Thread Zygo Blaxell
Package: fglrx-driver Version: 8.20.8-1.1 Severity: grave The fglrx-driver package in the Debian archive declares a dependency on xserver-xorg >= 6.8.0 and <= 6.8.99, but the only version of xserver-xorg in the archive at the moment (as far as I can tell) is 6.9.0. This makes the fglrx-driver p