Could you please add the fix for 611906 to stable? I saw
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/03/msg00380.html
but no further follow-ups.
Thanks!
Wagner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
As explained in
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2255
, that bug is triggered by lots of http requests, and that only happens
when there is a certain number of new remote changes.
Could you try the following patch?
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/file1106/issue2255fix-basicauth.diff
Reg
At this upstream issue:
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2255
there's a patch that may fix this bug.
In short, it seems that the Python 2.6.5 package differs slightly from upstream
2.6.5, and that difference triggers the same bug for basic authentication (the
applied fix only deals with d
This bug report is a bit short on details, but it may be
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2179
caused by a Python regression:
http://bugs.python.org/issue8797
Could you try the following workaround?
http://selenic.com/hg/rev/a1e575b48563
Regards,
Wagner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Followup-For: Bug #493834
Package: pymsnt
Version: 0.11.2-1
Found on the etch version; the suggested fix also worked fine for me (tested on
an @hotmail.com account).
Thanks,
Wagner
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (
--- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
["public use"]
> Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it.
> "public use" does not mean "use in public", in means "use by the
> public" -- i.e., "use by anyone".
I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native
[sent also to debian-legal for advice]
--- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote:
> > --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> >
> > > > Particularly, "public use"
--- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification:
> > "Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research
> > Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332.
> > All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public
> > use of this software."
>
> Neither I nor the ftp-team see a p
Package: ibm-3270
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The copyright file for ibm-3270 says:
"Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance
in clarifying them would be appreciated."
but there's no active bug about some issues.
Particularly, "public use" needs clarificati
9 matches
Mail list logo