Bug#611906: #611906 fix still missing on stable

2011-05-11 Thread Wagner Bruna
Could you please add the fix for 611906 to stable? I saw http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/03/msg00380.html but no further follow-ups. Thanks! Wagner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Bug#586907: #586907 the problem still happens - cannot pull the repo

2010-07-12 Thread Wagner Bruna
As explained in http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2255 , that bug is triggered by lots of http requests, and that only happens when there is a certain number of new remote changes. Could you try the following patch? http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/file1106/issue2255fix-basicauth.diff Reg

Bug#586907: bug #586907 is probably specific to debian python 2.6.5

2010-07-01 Thread Wagner Bruna
At this upstream issue: http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2255 there's a patch that may fix this bug. In short, it seems that the Python 2.6.5 package differs slightly from upstream 2.6.5, and that difference triggers the same bug for basic authentication (the applied fix only deals with d

Bug#586907: #586907: known issue?

2010-06-23 Thread Wagner Bruna
This bug report is a bit short on details, but it may be http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2179 caused by a Python regression: http://bugs.python.org/issue8797 Could you try the following workaround? http://selenic.com/hg/rev/a1e575b48563 Regards, Wagner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Bug#493834: bug #493834 found on etch (was re: pymsnt: problem with CVR0 in version string)

2008-08-05 Thread Wagner Bruna
Followup-For: Bug #493834 Package: pymsnt Version: 0.11.2-1 Found on the etch version; the suggested fix also worked fine for me (tested on an @hotmail.com account). Thanks, Wagner -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Wagner Bruna
--- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ["public use"] > Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it. > "public use" does not mean "use in public", in means "use by the > public" -- i.e., "use by anyone". I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Wagner Bruna
[sent also to debian-legal for advice] --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: > > --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > > > > Particularly, "public use"

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-22 Thread Wagner Bruna
--- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification: > > "Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research > > Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. > > All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public > > use of this software." > > Neither I nor the ftp-team see a p

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-21 Thread Wagner Bruna
Package: ibm-3270 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 The copyright file for ibm-3270 says: "Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance in clarifying them would be appreciated." but there's no active bug about some issues. Particularly, "public use" needs clarificati