Control: fixed 1091147 2.10.10+dfsg-1
Control: fixed 1091147 2.12.0+dfsg-1
On 2024-12-22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> -MT /<>/build/g12a/debug/libc/setjmp.o -MP -c
>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S -o /<>/build/g12a/debug/libc/setjmp.o
>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S: Assembler messages:
>> lib/libc/aarch64
On 2025-01-05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 05.01.25 07:03, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> Not sure if this is a bug or intentional change in binutils...
>
> please recheck with the most recent version in unstable.
I have done many builds over the course of the last few day
On 2025-01-04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2024-12-22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S: Assembler messages:
>>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S:46: Warning: entity size for SHF_MERGE /
>>> SHF_STRINGS not specified
>>> /tmp/ccsOcV8D.s: Error:
On 2024-12-22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S: Assembler messages:
>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S:46: Warning: entity size for SHF_MERGE /
>> SHF_STRINGS not specified
>> /tmp/ccsOcV8D.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
>> make[2]: *** [Makefile:1496:
>> /<>/build/
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1091125 in u-boot reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/u-boot/-/commit/28c781ec718225393e7a55e0e964f42b2f7
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1091125 in u-boot reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/u-boot/-/commit/28c781ec718225393e7a55e0e964f42b2f7
Control: tags 1091118 +pending
On 2024-12-23, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 05:44:11PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > /<>/./pylibfdt/libfdt_wrap.c: In function
>> > ‘_wrap_fdt_next_node’:
>> > /<>/./pylibfdt/libfdt_wrap.c:5599:17: error: too few
>> > arguments to f
Control: severity 1038845 important
On 2023-06-21, bl...@debian.org wrote:
> reprotest is currently referencing /etc/timezone without support for
> /etc/localtime. /etc/timezone is a legacy interface that is Debian
> specific. The cross-distro standard /etc/localtime (as a symlink to
> the appropr
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1082289 in reprotest reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reprotest/-/commit/690daaf52575c18c
On 2024-09-11, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> guile-gnutls (4.0.0-2) experimental; urgency=low
> .
>* Re-run cme update dpkg-copyright, now that #1052168 is fixed.
>* Test suggested fix for FTBFS by Natanael Copa. Closes: #1069390
Any chance this could get uploaded to unstable soon?
On 2024-10-07, Santiago Vila wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
...
> ;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
> ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/guile/3.0/site-ccache/bytestructures/guile
Control: tags 1081867 pending
On 2024-09-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Control: forwarded 1081867
> https://github.com/artyom-poptsov/guile-ssh/issues/42
>
> On 2024-09-15, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build
Control: forwarded 1081867 https://github.com/artyom-poptsov/guile-ssh/issues/42
On 2024-09-15, Santiago Vila wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
...
> In file included from /usr/include/libssh/callbacks.h:30,
> from ../../../../li
Control: reassign 1081078 guile-gcrypt
Control: affects 1081078 guix
> On 2024-09-08, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> FAIL: tests/nar.scm - restore-file-set (signed, valid)
>> FAIL: tests/nar.scm - restore-file-set with directories (signed, valid)
>> FAIL: tests/nar.scm - restore-file-set (corrupt)
...
>>
Control: forwarded 1081025 https://github.com/epoptes/epoptes/issues/193
On 2024-09-06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Running epoptes on debian trixie results in:
>
> $ epoptes
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/epoptes", line 20, in
>
Package: epoptes
Version: 23.08-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org
Running epoptes on debian trixie results in:
$ epoptes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/epoptes", line 20, in
from epoptes.ui import gui
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ep
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1073710 in guix reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/guix/-/commit/1cf003a48bcb2fa4d09776dd536e7425fe84660
Control: forwarded 1067952
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-mes/2024-01/msg8.html
On 2024-03-29, Kentaro HAYASHI wrote:
> mes 0.26-1 fails to build on armhf.
>
> FYI:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mes&arch=armhf&ver=0.26-1&stamp=1704511792&raw=0
Yeah, forwarded thi
Control: fixed 1064748 1.4.0-6
Marking this as fixed in 1.4.0-6, although strictly speaking, this is
only worked around by disabling the tests, so the bug should remain
open.
live well,
vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: forwarded 1064748 https://debbugs.gnu.org/69518
Control: tags 1064748 confirmed
The actual failed tests are:
test-name: fold-available-packages with/without cache
test-name: find-packages-by-name with cache
test-name: find-packages-by-name + version, with cache
test-name: find-package-lo
28 03:25:42.0 -0800
+++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2023-12-05 15:52:45.0 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
+lirc (0.10.1-7.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Vagrant Cascadian ]
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * tools: Do not embed build date and kernel version in various files.
+(C
On 2023-09-26, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
...
>> cc1: error: ‘-fcf-protection=full’ is not supported for this target
>> make[3]: *** [/<>/Makefile:1816: include/generated/env.in]
>> Erro
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1052724 in u-boot reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/u-boot/-/commit/8ecfe9557fcfd217c2df88f183a4c3b3144
Control: tags 1042918 pending
On 2023-08-02, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> I thought we'd managed to avoid this, in #1035645, but we just did the
> transition, and I see reprotest is FTBFS:
...
> py311: commands[0] .pybuild/cpython3_3.11_reprotest/build>
> .tox/py311/bin/python -m coverage r
> un --omi
On 2023-07-16, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 at 18:27:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> But, what matters here is the CTTE ruling in #1035831 -- for the time being,
>> packages must not move files between locations affected by the aliasing.
>
> If that happens in reality, then yes, th
On 2023-06-25, Ingo Saitz wrote:
> libdeb.so is both in binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu and binutils-msp430 in
> the same location. This was not the case in ~ti1, where libdeb.so was in
> /usr/lib/bfd-plugins/libdep.so. Thus the upgrade fails:
>
> Preparing to unpack .../binutils-msp430_2.24~ti2_amd64.de
tested in unstable and experimental.
Thanks for maintaining manderlbot!
live well,
vagrant
From 1d8e42b99a87810397cd1c50c36c79d545192575 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vagrant Cascadian
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 07:10:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] debian/rules: Specify path to "erl"
grant
From c62fcbde299245ffcd027fd524f2fd2419d874c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vagrant Cascadian
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:44:06 -0700
Subject: Makefile: Ensure perl path is set to '/usr/bin/perl'.
Using 'which' to detect the path to perl may result in /bin/perl,
which is only typically
r maintaining php8.2!
live well,
vagrant
From 830b885bf5495bd079bf698c7a3352ccf7a38633 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vagrant Cascadian
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:59:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] scripts/php*.in: Explicitly define the path to sed.
The full path is detected by configure, resulting
Control: severity 1033845 important
Given that this only affects a single platform, and there are other
tested working boot options for this platform, I am downgrading the
severity to important.
On 2023-04-02, Wolf wrote:
> If the u-boot is installed on the internal emmc then u-boot is failing as
On 2023-03-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> After upgrading to the latest firefox-esr, all web pages fail to display
> anything...
...
> Are there any unversioned or missing dependencies on something that
> should also come from sid?
Apparently, it needs libnss3 2:3.89-1 from sid to w
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 102.9.0esr-1
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org
After upgrading to the latest firefox-esr, all web pages fail to display
anything... except those in my pinned tabs, although those also fail to do
anything other than display presumably cached content? Clo
On 2023-02-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2023-02-01, Jérôme Charaoui wrote:
>> Perhaps an alternative would be to add "puppet-agent" as a build
>> dependency, because that package will create a "puppet" user in the
>> environment.
And for complet
On 2023-02-01, Jérôme Charaoui wrote:
> I don't know how common that is in build environments, but it's not
> something that I have or think I should have in my build (sbuild) or
> test (autopkgtest) environments.
I was able to reproduce the issue with sbuild.
This appears to be because sbuild
On 2022-12-29, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-12-28 at 16:30 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> dreamplug
>
> booting u-boot and Debian both from external mmc
>
> testing: 2022.04+dfsg-2+b1 "FDT and ATAGS support not compiled in" then
> resets and loops doi
Control: found 1029066 230
On 2023-01-17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello, your package FTBFS when internet is not available during control file
> regeneration phase
...
> debian/tests/control.sh
> Generating the debian/tests/control file...
...
> ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfi
Control: severity 1027176 important
On 2023-01-05, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Control: retitle 1027176 u-boot-amlogic: broken non-EFI boot on amlogic boards
...
> At this point, I am assuming that all the amlogic builds are affected,
> and worst case we include the "noefi"
On 2022-12-28, Rick Thomas wrote:
> A Cubox-i running Debian bullseye (11.6). According to versions> It has "u-boot-tools" (version 2021.01+dfsg-5) installed,
> but none of the u-boot- packages installed.
>
> If I reboot it and watch the serial console, I see it showing "U-boot
> 2021.01-dfsg-5"
Control: retitle 1027176 u-boot-amlogic: broken non-EFI boot on amlogic boards
On 2023-01-05, Frédéric Danis wrote:
> On 03/01/2023 18:55, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> Sounds like the bug *is* reproducible with unstable and experiemental
>> versions, from reading the logs; look
On 2023-01-05, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 13:21 -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
>> Thank you for your help here! I also did some testing, and everything
>> looks OK. The only thing to mention is that the the script
>> u-boot-install-rockchip does not auto detect my board.
>>
>
On 2023-01-04, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> * Vagrant Cascadian [2022-12-28 16:56]:
>>> If you have access to any of these boards, please consider testing
>>> u-boot versions as packaged in debian for versions from debian stable
>>> (2021.01*), testing (2022
On 2023-01-05, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> I've tested the following platforms and updated the wiki with my
> results:
>
>
> - roc-pc-rk3399, 2023.01-rc4+dfsg-1 from experimental
> - SD boot: works
> - MAC address: correctly derived from serial number
>
> - roc-pc-rk3399, 2022.10+dfsg-2
On 2023-01-03, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2023-01-03, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2023-01-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2023-01-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>>> The odroid-c2 fails to b
On 2023-01-03, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2023-01-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2023-01-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> The odroid-c2 fails to boot syslinux/extlinux style menus (e.g. those
>>>>
On 2023-01-03, Frédéric Danis wrote:
> On 03/01/2023 18:55, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2023-01-03, Frédéric Danis wrote:
>>> Afaiu, the bug is not reproducible with unstable and experimental
>>> versions, but boot crash before starting the kernel, see
>>>
On 2023-01-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2023-01-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> The odroid-c2 fails to boot syslinux/extlinux style menus (e.g. those
>>> produced by u-boot-menu) or boot.scr as of upstream 2022.07-rc1. Th
On 2023-01-03, Frédéric Danis wrote:
> On 29/12/2022 00:07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> The odroid-c2 fails to boot syslinux/extlinux style menus (e.g. those
>>> produced by u-boot-menu) or boot.scr as of upstream 2022.07-rc1
On 2023-01-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> The odroid-c2 fails to boot syslinux/extlinux style menus (e.g. those
>> produced by u-boot-menu) or boot.scr as of upstream 2022.07-rc1. The
>> commit triggering the issue h
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> The odroid-c2 fails to boot syslinux/extlinux style menus (e.g. those
> produced by u-boot-menu) or boot.scr as of upstream 2022.07-rc1. The
> commit triggering the issue has been identified as:
>
> a9bf024b2933bba0e23038892970a18b72dfaeb4
Package: u-boot
Version: 2022.04+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 2022.10+dfsg-2
X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org, m...@drkrebs.de, t...@cyrius.com,
i...@debian.org
At least two people have reported the same issue on sheevaplug and
guruplug failing to boot with a message "FDT and ATAGS
On 2022-12-29, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*)
>> and experimental (2023.01-rc*)
>>
>> # arm64
>> ...
>> rock64-rk3328
>
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>>> te
On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>>> tested. If you have a relevent board, please consider testing a
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011863 in guix reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/guix/-/commit/6b1c4a4ff194a9e225c0629a87e7d3a218a8b2c
On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get
>> tested. If you have a relevent board, please consider testing and
>> reporting the status:
>>
>> http
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
