Hi,
may I kindly ask why you keep on uploading new versions, while being
fully aware that there is no way at all to make them even start?
In case you wonder: I have a locally built Anki version where I patched
out the QT version check. That works well enough for me. Your uploads
are replacing thi
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:27:43AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> HI Salvatore,
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:44:49PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: tags 852627 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for lcms2 (ver
e16d58fd5eee66d96d0f31b730eca299157f109a
Author: Thomas Weber
Date: Thu Jan 26 11:04:40 2017 +0100
Debian release 2.8-4
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 309a388..602f838 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lcms2 (2.8-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New patch
HI Salvatore,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:44:49PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags 852627 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for lcms2 (versioned as 2.8-3.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Sorry, I
Package: xfce4-terminal
Version: 0.6.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Launching xfce4-terminal as normal user gives the following error message in an
error window:
"Failed to execute child
grantpt failed: Operation not permitted"
After closing the error message, the ter
tag 749975 pending
thanks
Date: Thu Jun 5 14:45:10 2014 +
Author: Thomas Weber
Commit ID: e2c7cdda765d4fb64911d3219f87a117f962f8a4
Commit URL:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/lcms2.git;a=commitdiff;h=e2c7cdda765d4fb64911d3219f87a117f962f8a4
Patch URL:
http
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:21:05PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 14:09:17 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > @@ -89,7 +93,7 @@ build-indep:
> > build-arch:
> > dh_quilt_patch
> > echo Using MPI implementation $(PETSC_MPI) in directory $(PE
u-c-debug/conf/petscvariables: No such file or directory
/tmp/petsc/conf/rules:963: /tmp/petsc/linux-gnu-c-debug/conf/petscrules: No
such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target
`/tmp/petsc/linux-gnu-c-debug/conf/petscrules'. Stop.
Thomas
>From f5f31590c3098971cefb
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:48:13AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-12-26 10:38, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> I'm currently doing lenny->squeeze->wheezy upgrade tests to find
> packages that "did something wrong (but did not fail)" in lenny or
> lenny->squeeze that makes the upgrade to whee
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 07:08:27AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.4-8
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> Control: affects -1 + octave-ad octave-zenity
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed m
tag 664797 pending
thanks
Date: Thu Aug 2 19:10:37 2012 +0200
Author: Thomas Weber
Commit ID: 87b565a8939fbab1e0c151172049c50cff50c8e7
Commit URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-octave/octave-odepkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=87b565a8939fbab1e0c151172049c50cff50c8e7
Patch URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p
tag 681355 pending
thanks
Date: Sun Jul 22 23:12:37 2012 +0200
Author: Thomas Weber
Commit ID: 401bd399aa005488f2152681a533ad0a15b426ea
Commit URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-octave/octave-java.git;a=commitdiff;h=401bd399aa005488f2152681a533ad0a15b426ea
Patch URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p
Hi Lutz,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:28:49PM +0200, Lutz Kohl wrote:
> Package: octave-java
> Version: 1.2.8-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Invoking
>
> javaclasspath
>
> in octave on architecture armel produces the error
Can you act as guinea pig for a new package? I don't have access to
armel mys
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 03:14:36PM +0100, Gordon Shumway wrote:
> Package: xcdroast
> Version: 0.98+0alpha16-1
> Severity: normal
This grave bug is now 3 years old, with no apparent maintainer activity
for the xcdroast package for as long.
Hector, unless you disagree, I intend to ask for xcdroast
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:30:26PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > I wasn't able to reproduce it, and I didn't see anyone else having
> > similar problems.
>
> I experience the crash on two different machines of mine (actually my
> main machines at home and work), so this is a real blocker f
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:17:48PM +, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: octave-java
> Version: 1.2.8-4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
>
> This version of octave-java completely breaks octave.
Sébastien,
is this the same issue we tried to debug in IRC? I wasn't able to
reproduce it, and I
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 02:21:05PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Thanks for noticing this. Obviously there is a missing dependency of
> octave on dpkg-dev >= 1.16.0.
Ah, shit. That's what I get for uploading late at night.
> Thomas: can you push your git commits related to version 3.6.1-2 ?
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:19:13PM +0530, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Package: oggvideotools
> Version: 0.8-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
oggvideotools seems to be dead upstream:
1) The latest release is from 2010-05-30.
2) The latest SVN checkin is from 2010-11-2
Hi Andres,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 02:19:12PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Package: libmusicbrainz-ruby
> Severity: grave
>
> This package depends on an obsolete version of libmusicbrainz, which
> is going to be removed from the archive in the near future. Please
> remove libmusicbrainz-ruby as
package: logjam
fixed 555483 4.6.2-1
thanks
I cannot reproduce the bug in the new upstream version, so I assume it's
fixed there as well.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:37:45PM +0100, bgr...@toplitzer.net wrote:
> Package: strigi-dbg
> Version: 0.7.7-1
> Severity: grave
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> trying to debug on #659828 I found the following problem:
> the strigi-dbg package doesn't work with gdb:
Ther
Package: libafflib0
Severity 645915 normal
thanks
I'm downgrading the severity, because I cannot reproduce this in my i386
chroot.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:37:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: libafflib0
> Version: 3.6.6-1.1
> Severity: serious
>
> On i386 only, libafflib is linked against both libreadline which is
> under GPLV3+, and libssl which is under a GPL-incompatible license.
Are you sure about the linkage
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:45:05PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> Did you see the following message from me? I think I found the reason
> that libranlib.la is not being built, and a relatively simple fix.
Yes, thanks for the help. I already pushed it to my quick-and-dirty
repository at
http://ano
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:07:50PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 24-Oct-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
> | I've put a log file of the build at
> | http://people.debian.org/~tweber/octave.log.bz2
> |
> | The commands effectively run are:
> | automake --foreign --verb
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:03:57PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:24:17PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> > If you don't want to change octlibdir, then you can change the lines
> > like
> >
> > octlib_LTLIBRARIES = liboctave.la
> &g
Hi Colin,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 10:20:29AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Thanks to a note from John W. Eaton that the development version doesn't
> > suffer from this problem, I tracked down the fix and have prepared a
> > suitabl
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:24:17PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> If you don't want to change octlibdir, then you can change the lines
> like
>
> octlib_LTLIBRARIES = liboctave.la
>
> in the Makefile.am files to be
>
> lib_LTLIBRARIES = liboctave.la
>
> instead. It's the octlib (or lib) pre
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:28:54PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 19-Aug-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> | The problem is that dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't like the fact that Octave
> | uses normal SONAMEs for its libraries now, but ships them in a private
> | path (so dpkg-shlibde
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:51:36AM -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 06:11, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > Package: octave3.2
> > Version: 3.2.4-8
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > it is sufficient to remove the curl/types.h line - octave builds just
> > fine then.
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part:
> > g++ -c -fPIC -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc
> > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/include/freetype2 -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast
> > -Wformat -O2 -g -pthread oct-alloc.cc -o pic/oct-alloc.o
> >
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 11:09:30PM -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> I'm going to try to convince upstream again to accept all versions of
> Qt 4 at least after 4.4. If not, I guess we'll go with the patch to
> use Qt 4.7 instead of 4.6
Sorry, no. If there's no technical reason for a bump in
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:54:13PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 22:45 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 08:45:07PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > It won't work on the buildds, however, whether pbuilder handles it or
> &g
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 08:45:07PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> reopen 618139
> thanks
>
> On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 20:39 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> > > > E: Package 'libcurl4-dev' has no installation candidate
> [...]
> >
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.4-8
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in s
Hi Julien,
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:08:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag 607071 squeeze-will-remove
> kthxbye
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58 -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>
> > This report is mostly a reminder to myself to
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 05:04:03AM +0800, Geoff Gole wrote:
> fwiw, I can reproduce this.
>
> $ apt-get install octave-symbolic
> ...
Ehm, the part above would have been interesting, because
> $ octave
> GNU Octave, version 3.0.1
3.0.1 is only available in Lenny.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBS
package octave-symbolic
tags 607071 unreproducible
severity 607071 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 08:32:27AM -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 26 December 2010 17:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58 -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> >
> >> This
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:18:34PM -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 15 December 2010 16:17, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58AM -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> >> Package: octave-symbolic
> >> Version: 1.0.9-1+b1
> >&
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58AM -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Package: octave-symbolic
> Version: 1.0.9-1+b1
> Severity: grave
>
> octave-symbolic is largely unusable. Calling any of its functions
> other than "sym" results in C++ exceptions like this one:
>
> error: T& Array::c
package octave3.2
severity 588024 normal
thanks
I'm downgrading the severity of this bug. I can't reproduce it and have
not heard back after one week from the submitter.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Hi Bas,
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:49:06AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.4-6
> Severity: serious
>
> When upgrading octave, the octave segfaults during trigger processing:
>
> Get: 278 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main octave-control 1.0.11-2 [447kB]
> Get: 279
Package: php5-xdebug
Version: 2.0.5-1+b1
Severity: grave
Hi,
with PHP 5.3, xdebug doesn't show the value of local variables anymore.
This bug is fixed upstream, but only in development releases.
Unfortunately, without the values of such variables, xdebug is nearly
useless for debugging.
Upstrea
Something is wrong with the ./configure run. It replaces the content on
magick/magick-config.h with 'garbage', only lines like
/* Define if you have the bzip2 library */
#ifndef MAGICKCORE_^A
#define MAGICKCORE_^A ^B
#endif
remain in there. This happens even when
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:35:30AM +0200, nb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed the php-log 1.12.0 package, but I still have the same
> problem.
Are you sure the new package is used? 1.12 hasn't been uploaded to
Debian yet, so you must have installed it outside of dpkg, is that
correct?
T
Package: lapack
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on mipsel
Hi,
3.2.1-7 FTBFS on mipsel due to blas 1.2-4 beind used during the build. I
guess a (>=1.2.-7) is needed in the build dependencies.
I tried to get the wanna-build team to give the build back (thereby not
forcing a rebuild on eve
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:27:15PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> tag 572265 + patch
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:01:40 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > I didn't actually test it, but
> > http://pear.php.net/package/Log/download/
> > indicates tha
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:06:52PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the soname bump of libmagickcore, I now have #573972:
>
> > pyxplot explicitly depends on libmagickcore2-extra, which no longer exists
> > after the recent imagemagick upload to unstable; it's been replaced b
I didn't actually test it, but
http://pear.php.net/package/Log/download/
indicates that the 1.12.0 version of Pear Log fixes this.
However, php-log is orphaned.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+h5utils (1.12-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Switch to octave3.2-headers
+
+ -- Thomas Weber Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:11:50 +
+
h5utils (1.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Changed build-dep in libhdf4-dev instead of libhdf4g-dev.
diff --gi
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:24:25PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:38:18AM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Thomas Weber writes:
> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:24:39PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > >> It looks like b
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:38:18AM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Thomas Weber writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:24:39PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> It looks like building without -g might work around the problem, so
> >> removing
>
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:50:13AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: octave-ga
> Version: 0.9.7-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-02-24 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, y
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:32:53AM +0100, Michael Weitzel wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> During installation the Octave 3.2 package does not create the directory
> /usr/share/oct
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 07:35:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: dynare
> Version: 4.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Sébastien,
any chance of disabling the longer running tests? Or having them print
out something every few
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:24:39PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Heya,
>
> It looks like octave3.2 is hitting a ld bug:
> | g++ -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,liboctinterp.so -o liboctinterp.so [...]
> | /usr/bin/ld: non-dynamic relo
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:03:20PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi John!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > No, it hasn't changed. All .oct files depend on liboctinterp, which
> > depends on liboctave and a number of other libraries, and liboctave
> > depends on libcruft and a number of other libraries. So
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:06:24AM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 1-Feb-2010, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> | On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> | > Hi!
> | >
> | > > octave-specfun is currently uninstallable in sid, as it depends o
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > octave-specfun is currently uninstallable in sid, as it depends on
> > libhdf5-1.8.3, while octave3.2 depends on libhdf5-1.8.4.
> > Please rebuild octave-specfun against libhdf5-1.8.4.
>
> Actually, on further inspection,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:31:35AM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > [Lucas, do you want to be kept in CC?]
> >
> > Alright, this is indeed a change in TexLive, and an intended one. See
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2009/12/msg00630.html
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-mai
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:43:04AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: dynare
> > Version: 4.0.4-6
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091213 qa-
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: dynare
> Version: 4.0.4-6
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091213 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package faile
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 05:25:42PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Source: dynare
> > Version: 4.0.4-4
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There was an error while trying to
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: dynare
> Version: 4.0.4-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Start Time: 20090927-1023
>
> [...]
>
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), octave3.2-headers (>= 3.2
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:24:47PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Thomas Weber a écrit :
> > Hi Aurelien,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> Package: octave3.2-headers
> >> Version: 3.2.0-2
> >> Severity: gr
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:32:28PM +0200, br...@ira.uka.de wrote:
> Hi,
> recompiling the package (apt-get source octave3.2 etc.) fixes the problem.
That's a work-around, not a fix (well, the original code we introduced
is already a work-around).
I'm working on a better solution, but I need to as
Hi Aurelien,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: octave3.2-headers
> Version: 3.2.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> # apt-get install octave3.2-headers
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading sta
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:13:23AM -0400, Jason Riedy wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> > octave: error while loading shared libraries: libumfpack.so.3.2.0: cannot
> > open shared object file: No such file or director
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Just for the record, I see the same problem on an amd64 system (Intel
> EM64T chip).
Is this a normal installation or as part of a build process?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> you was right, my problem is inthe atlas library:
Thanks for the follow-up.
>
> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib /usr/bin/octave -q --eval '[1 2; 3 4] * [1; 1i]'
> ans =
>1 + 2i
>3 + 4i
>
> $ lmt-linux ~ $ /usr/bin/o
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> > Package: octave3.0
> > Version: 1:3.0.1-7
> > Arch: i386
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just rea
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:35:01AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Thomas Weber [2009-04-22 23:04]:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> > > Package: octave3.0
> > > Version: 1:3.0.1-7
> > > Arch: i386
> > >
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.1-7
> Arch: i386
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just realized that I can multiply a real 2x2 matrix by a complex vector.
Uh, yes. Why shouldn't this work? Or in other words, how do you
distingu
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:47:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.5-2
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi
>
> The postinst of octave3.0 seems to hang on at least the mipsel buildds (for
> unstable) [1].
>
> This issue blocks the buildds from building any other package till t
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:19:19PM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 9-Apr-2009, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> | Hi Rafael, thanks for the forthcoming fix to the problem.
> |
> | About the severity, I appreciate you need to get the new version across
> | to testing but I don't think I could justify it
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:30:59AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.4~rc5-2
> Severity: serious
>
> This version of the octave3.0 package is based on a release candidate
> snapshot for the upcoming 3.0.4 version. The upstream authors have told
> us [1] that
package octave-symbolic
severity 516942 normal
tags 516942 moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:20:23PM +0100, Oz N wrote:
> Package: octave-symbolic
> Version: 1.0.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi, I have installed octave symbolic from 'experimenta
package octave3.0
tags 513576 confirmed
tags 513576 upstream
forwarded 513576
http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-February/010599.html
thanks
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 04:09:06PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I guess octave3 could just provide the
>
> /usr/share/octave/
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:14:50PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Attached the diff between upstream's 1.0.6 and 1.0.7. I'll ask the
> release-team about the preferred solution (either patching or uploading
> the new upstream version).
Okay, we are clear from debian-release
Attached the diff between upstream's 1.0.6 and 1.0.7. I'll ask the
release-team about the preferred solution (either patching or uploading
the new upstream version).
Thomas
1.0.6-1.0.7.diff.bz2
Description: Binary data
package: octave-symbolic
tag 512075 confirmed
fixed 512075 1.0.7-1
thanks
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:20:47AM +, Steve Cotton wrote:
> 1. octave-symbolic is missing a dependency on libginac1.4
>
> 2. Even with libginac1.4 installed, Octave doesn't find the
> library without the help of
> exp
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:15:40PM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> >>>>> TW == Thomas Weber [2008-10-21]
>
> TW> Package is dead upstream, maintainer seems MIA.
>
> Maintainer is here and reads what you write.
Sorry then, I thought your latest upload w
This bug is triggered by a normal installation with emacs22. It works
with emacs21 however.
Package is dead upstream, maintainer seems MIA.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 09:15 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Package: octave-vrml
> > > Version: 1.0.6-2
> > > S
Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: octave-vrml
> > Version: 1.0.6-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 3.5
> >
> > When calling a vrml
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: octave-vrml
> Version: 1.0.6-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.5
>
> When calling a vrml function from octave the error
> sh: freewrl: command not found
> cmd = freewrl/tmp/octave_vrml_output.wr
3.8.0 (no changes
needed)
* added myself to the uploaders list.
[ Thomas Weber ]
* New patch: patches/no-nan-values
Error out in case of NaN values, they are not
supported by VTK (closes: 480431)
I didn't remove the standards bum
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:15:07PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]:
>
> > Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > >
On 03/08/08 10:40 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Sunday 03 August 2008 10:34:45 Thomas Weber wrote:
> > On 03/08/08 10:23 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > > OK, I've posted those files at
> > > http://math.berkeley.edu/~schepler/octave-nan/ .
> >
> >
On 03/08/08 10:23 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> OK, I've posted those files at http://math.berkeley.edu/~schepler/octave-nan/
> .
Sorry, 403 on all files. Can you check the permissions?
> Some possibly relevant information: the chroot is set up with /bin/sh
> pointing
> to dash, and the pbui
On 02/08/08 23:18 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Saturday 02 August 2008 13:09:23 ?lafur Jens Sigur?sson wrote:
> > This works fine for me on an i386 machine with a sid pbuilder.
> >
> > The error that you are getting implies that the octave-nan package is
> > not getting installed (the octave-
Hi Lucas,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.05.2008, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Package: octave-epstk
> Version: 2.2-10
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080506 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
this error is real, but not due to the different gcc versions.
package matwrap
severity 477041 important
thanks
On 27/04/08 10:38 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On 20/04/08 18:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: matwrap
> > Version: 0.57-10
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20
On 20/04/08 18:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: matwrap
> Version: 0.57-10
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
>
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2008, 11:05 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-11 09:42]:
>
> > package octplot
> > reassign 470327 fltk1.1
> > found 1.1.8~rc1-2
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
>
package octplot
reassign 470327 fltk1.1
found 1.1.8~rc1-2
thanks
Hi Aaron,
fltk-config outputs several lines instead of one when called as
$ fltk-config --use-gl --libs
which makes it difficult to use the output in further commands. The
problem is in the "if" part, starting at line 319
On 03/01/08 10:56 +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 3.0.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> panic: Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...
> attempting to save variables to `octave-core'...
> save to `octave-core' complete
> Segmentation fault
This turns out to be a toolchain
Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 06/02/08 at 10:59 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > package: octave2.1
> > tags 464334 unreproducible
> > thanks
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> >
package: octave2.1
tags 464334 unreproducible
thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Package: octave2.1
> Version: 1:2.1.73-16
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> In a clean chroot:
>
> Setting up octave2.1 (1:2.1.73-16) ...
> ls: cannot access /usr/share/octave/3
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
