This is due to improper use of setuptools_scm in docs/conf.py. This is
fixed [1] in version 0.16.8, along with other build errors. Please
consider packaging the new version.
[1]
https://github.com/pimutils/vdirsyncer/commit/b1214cd693d7a6c6693da3d070e8b9965a84a88e
Package: bubbros
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.2
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
Dear Maintainer,
According to bubbob/levels/README.txt (and the file program) the *.bin files
in bubbob/levels are MacBinary files. There appears to be no source for these
Package: xtv
Version: 1.1-13
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
Dear Maintainer,
The debian/copyright file says that xtv falls under the Artistic License.
However, xtv.lsm says "Copying-policy: GPL". Please fix the copyright file or
moti
Package: ruby-opengl
Version: 0.60.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
Dear Maintainer,
The debian/copyright file says that the files in examples/NeHe/ are "licensed
under a free license", but it doesn't specify whic
license [2]? Both packages that use your code
are under the GPL license, so the 3-clause license is needed.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ModifiedBSD
[2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OriginalBSD
Regards,
Sam Geeraerts
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
Sebastian Muszynski wrote:
I will remove the ripdump-Implementation from ax25spyd ASAP.
It is possible to cancel the removal request?
Hi Sebastian,
Do you plan to re-introduce this package with the non-free code removed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
It looks like this was fixed for Wheezy, but not for Squeeze. Will the
stable release also get a fix?
Thanks,
Sam Geeraerts
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: sharand
Version: 0.0.20040607-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
File main/sha1.c has this license notice:
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works th
Package: as31
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file examples/paulmon1.asm has the following notice:
"Please distribute freely -- may not be sold, period."
Restricting commercial distribution violates D
Package: avogadro
Version: 1.0.1-3+b1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6, 2.1.1
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The directory 'testfiles' in the source package contans some files
that appear to have a non-free license.
methane.g03 has this
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
File main/sha1.c has this license notice:
* This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
* others,
Package: antlr-doc
Version: 2.7.7-16
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: libreplanet gnewsense
In directory examples/java/unicode.IDENTs there are 2 files,
ShowString.java and StreamConverter.java that have this license
statement:
Package: a2ps
Version: 1:4.14-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
Usertags: libreplanet
The license notice in afm/MustRead.html says the following:
"This file and the 35 PostScript(R) AFM files it
accompanies may be used, copied, and distributed for any purpose and
wi
I certainly want to help getting this solved, but I don't know what all
the appropriate actions are. I also don't know what's involved in the
intermediate approach you suggest, but from your explanation I gather
that's easier. I'm guessing the next stable point release is not far
off, so the la
I'm happy those files are deleted upstream (at least in the stable
branch). But I think at least these terms make the .exe files
undistributable:
* publish the software for others to copy;
* transfer the software or this agreement to any third party; or
AFAIK, that does require that th
Package: adolc
Version: 2.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The source package contains the files vcredist_x86.exe and vcredist_x64.exe.
The following is an excerpt from eula.rtf contained in those CAB ar
Package: alpine
Version: 2.00+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file pico/msmem.c contains the following comment:
===
* This code originally written by Stephen Chung and posted to a Usene
Will the file be updated with that information to avoid confusion with
its use in other packages and distributions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 04:51:52PM +0200, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
So we know that the relicensing happend prior to its use by nyquist.
(I don't know the specific date, however, which is why I said "not
sure", above).
Does that help?
I had a clos
Sebastian Muszynski has sent an e-mail to the copyright holder to ask
about relicensing the code. No response so far, afaik. See bug report
#630894.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
When was the code relicensed?
Not sure.
Then how can we determine if any of the xlisp dependent packages in any
of the Debian versions are still affected?
It would also be good to make this information available to other
distributions who might be distributing affe
Will the file be updated with that information to avoid confusion with
its use in other packages and distributions?
When was the code relicensed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Nearly the same file is also used in the nyquist package, see bug #631646.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: nyquist
Version: 2.29-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file xlisp/xlbfun.c contains the following license notice:
/* Copyright (c) 1985, by David Michael Betz
All Rights Reserved
Permis
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.12-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file lib-src/libnyquist/nyquist/xlisp/xlbfun.c contains the following
license notice:
/* Copyright (c) 1985, by David Michael Betz
All
Package: abuse-frabs
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The license notice in addon/claudio/claudio.lsp does not allow distribution or
commercial use. It probably applies to all files in addon/claudio.
Note that the same file exists also in ax25-apps. See bug report #630893.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Note that the same file exists also in ax25spyd. See bug report #630894.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: ace
Version: 5.7.7-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.6, 2.1.7
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
In ACE+TAO+CIAO-src-5.7.7.tar.bz2 there is document ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/
connectors/dds4ccm/docs/ptc_09-10-26 DDS4CCM v1-0 WCB.pdf, which
Package: ax25spyd
Version: 0.23-8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file src/ripdump.c has the following license notice:
* Changes Copyright (c) 1993 Jeff White - N0POY, All Rights Reserved.
* Permission granted fo
Package: ax25-apps
Version: 0.0.6-16.2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
The file listen/ripdump.c has the following license notice:
* Changes Copyright (c) 1993 Jeff White - N0POY, All Rights Reserved.
* Permission granted for no
Package: axiom
Version: 20100701-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: libreplanet
The file zips/omcv1.4a.tgz/OMCv1.4a/src/copyright says
The SOFTWARE is provided for non-commercial use only. Any use or
reproduction of any part of
AMS have updated the license. Is it possible to still get this into Squeeze?
Originele bericht
Onderwerp: [Gnewsense-dev] Restatement of AMS-LaTeX license
Datum: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:08 -0400
Van: David M. Jones
Dear Benedikt, et al,
Enclosed is a copy of a new license file
Julien Cristau schreef:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 19:25:31 +0100, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
A similar issue was reported (and resolved) for glutg3-dev, see Debian bug
report #131997.
It's not a similar issue, it's the exact same one. So why do you open
this exactly?
Because the co
Package: mesa
Version: 7.0.3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
Subject: mesa: glut files have non-DFSG-free license
Package: mesa
Version: 7.0.3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
Some files in mesa have the following license:
/* This program is freely distributable without l
Benedikt Ahrens schreef:
hello,
the AMS has decided to publish amslatex under LPPL. see david jones'
message on the bottom.
this concerns future releases only. is this ok for gns? can we keep the
current package even if it isn't covered legally by this license?
Thanks for following up on this
36 matches
Mail list logo
