:130 (MIT-SHM)
Minor opcode: 2 (X_ShmDetach)
Resource id: 0x320002b
Sorry if this turns out to be a problem on my end.
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_6
834c1709043ee638dc11fa6a05e196f8d641e07e
Author: Riley Baird
Date: Sun Nov 29 20:44:21 2015 +1100
Noted changes in d/changelog
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index b7035a5..e7d9ed4 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ praw (3.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
I've started working on the FTBFS issue. The compilation issue
mentioned in this bug can be fixed by using the patch attached to this
email.
However, after this patch is applied, compilation fails for another
reason. I've included details of this in #805932.
Index: build/src/DeckManager.h
===
Package: libsigc++-2.0-dev
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Causes more than one other package to FTBFS
Hi,
I currently maintain granule. In the process of C++11 migration, I have come
across the following error message:
/usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/adaptors/adaptor_trait.h:25
The people at Arch seem to have a patch for this issue:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1481016
pgpjXt55Vgdwh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:37:44 +0200
Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:11:14 +1000 Riley Baird
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:54:00 -0400
> > Eric Dorland wrote:
> >
> > > * Riley Baird (bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch) wro
August 27, 2015 11:11:52 PM CEST, Riley Baird
> wrote:
> >> libassa3.5-5-dev was renamed to libassa-3.5-5-dev, which makes
> >reverse
> >> deps unbuildable. Please revert that change, there's no reason to
> >> rename the -dev package.
> >
> &
> libassa3.5-5-dev was renamed to libassa-3.5-5-dev, which makes reverse
> deps unbuildable. Please revert that change, there's no reason to
> rename the -dev package.
The only reverse dep is granule, which I've prepared a new version of.
I'm waiting for it to be uploaded.
pgpiNgGDdPOFQ.pgp
Des
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:54:00 -0400
Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Riley Baird (bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch) wrote:
> > This is listed in the FTP master's cruft report, so if I'm correct, it
> > shouldn't be necessary to request a removal from unstab
This is listed in the FTP master's cruft report, so if I'm correct, it
shouldn't be necessary to request a removal from unstable.
pgpKtU0FUkC7M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Source: pyelliptic
Version: 1.5.5
Severity: serious
Justification: completely broken
Due to an error in indentation when I submitted the arithmetic.py file
upstream, many functions within that file simply do not work when called. This
bug has been fixed upstream, but it is necessary to file this b
If not, would anyone be interested in
making it?
Yours sincerely,
Riley Baird
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=388141#356
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 27/01/15 21:27, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:21:22AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't think removal of moodle right now is a sane thing. I'll upload
>> a final 2.7.2 package to unstable within about 5 weeks.
>>
>> There has been a private discuss
On 24/01/15 00:44, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Riley Baird wrote at 17:16 (EST) on Thursday:
>> A couple of years ago, you offered to assist Debian in the relicensing
>> of its www pages. Has there been any progress on this?
>
> I remain willing to help, but I cannot take the le
Hi Bradley,
A couple of years ago, you offered to assist Debian in the relicensing
of its www pages. Has there been any progress on this?
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On 22/01/15 18:47, Dan Poltawski wrote:
> Hi Riley,
>
> On 22 January 2015 at 06:34, Riley Baird
> wrote:
>> P.S. I tried writing a message on the moodle forums to give them a heads
>> up on the situation, but the spam filter stopped me. It told me to send
>> m
On 22/01/15 07:56, Tomasz Muras wrote:
> Package: moodle
> Followup-For: Bug #754565
>
> It's not a big problem to remove whole tcpdf library from Moodle src - it
> is not used by Moodle itself. However, there are other issues with the
> package - including security fixes and I'm afraid there is t
know that someone is working on it. :-) )
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (
>>> Gah, this anonymous submitter is annoying. His claim that this "is
>>> practically impossible" is yet to be proved as I'm trying to prove the
>>> opposite.
>>
>> I am not anonymous.
>
> Just a first name and an anonymous remailer is more or less anonymous
> for me.
It isn't an anonymous remai
d be best to remove it".
>
> Gah, this anonymous submitter is annoying. His claim that this "is
> practically impossible" is yet to be proved as I'm trying to prove the
> opposite.
I am not anonymous. My name is Riley Baird. I am the maintainer of
pyelliptic. Is the
Hi,
> Do we think this is copyrightable material (adding FTP Master for
> input)? What does linux do (doesn't seem obvious from the link you
> quoted but codesearch seems to indicate debian linunx doesn't have
> it)? Has FreeBSD upstream been contacted?
Honestly, I doubt that it is copyrightabl
SED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGES.
*
* $FreeBSD$
There is a discussion about this going on at Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/767583
Thanks for reading,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
able to release them under a free license?
If you need any help, just ask.
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
P.S. If you have time, can you please take a look at this bug report [1]
and tell us:
1. Do you know the contact details of any of the other authors?
2. Have you written any of the manpages
ust ask.
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
If you have
any questions, then just let me know!
Thanks for your time,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 15/08/14 11:03, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> Okay, but as it stands, ther
> I believe Debian rules provide for an exception for some sorts of
> files that serve no functional purpose. I don't remember the details,
> but I suggest you take a look.
I'm not sure, but afaik, they don't (that's why there was the whole GFDL
issue a while ago).
> Anyway, it isn't my problem,
On 14/08/14 08:48, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> The funny man pages are not work
r sex.6fun and celibacy.1fun.
(Tell us if you have any more :D)
Yours thankfully,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
me countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use these works for any purpose, without any
conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
-
Thanks for doing this,
Riley Baird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debia
This certainly is a problem. Over the next week or two, I'll write to
the emails that you've given to see if we can get permission for those,
and to see if those authors know where to find some of the unknown ones.
Also, baby.1fun appears to have come from David W. Sanderson
(tenc...@nssdca.gsfc.n
> After a brief glance, I don't *think* any of the targets we ship use
> these files. They do appear to contain data that might be contstrued >
as sourceless firmware...
Ah, that's good. If this is the case, then it should be relatively easy
to rebuild the package with these files removed.
--
T
32 matches
Mail list logo
