Bug#1082326: marked as pending in proftpd

2024-11-14 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1082326 in proftpd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-proftpd-team/proftpd/-/commit/62a9106217dae98ef203

Bug#1086251: proftpd-dev: #include breaks several packages

2024-10-30 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Hi, am I correct, that in this case one normally schedules an binNMU to solve the issue? In our specific case this is not sufficient, b/c the test suite is broken; fix is on salsa: rev -3. I can't do anything before Saturday b/c the local WLAN does not allow SSH connections to anywhere. H. 3

Bug#1082326: Supplemental Group Inheritance Grants Unintended Access to GID 0

2024-10-07 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 22.09.2024 15:41, Brian Ristuccia wrote: Hi DBTS, Thank you. Do you know who might be responsible for requesting / issuing a CVE number for this issue? Not sure about this, I'll try to clarify. The upstream author provided a patch for this for the 1.3.9 line. I've created a Debian sourc

Bug#1083279: biber: can't build debian-package-book-* with pbuilder anymore because aof missing dependency

2024-10-03 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: severity -1 important On 03.10.2024 22:14, gregor herrmann wrote: Hi all, Which confirms my hunch that the problem is not with biber and not with libencode-perl. Thanks for the information. For now I lower the severity. H. -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Bug#1074976: fweb: ftbfs with GCC-14

2024-08-02 Thread Preuße
On 03.07.2024 14:27, Matthias Klose wrote: Hi Yann, The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with gcc-14/g++-14, but succeeds to build with gcc-13/g++-13. The severity of this report will be raised before the trixie release. Here are the first two patches in case you are

Bug#1077439: Fwd: Bug#1077439: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: FTBFS: wftodm.c:57:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]

2024-08-02 Thread Preuße
On 01.08.2024 14:30, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: Hi Danai, sounds rather like a wacky solution, as we hide the code issues, instead of solving them However as explained: the code is never used by the end user, hence the quality does not matter. I checked with diffoscope, everything fine. Go

Bug#1077439: Fwd: Bug#1077439: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: FTBFS: wftodm.c:57:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]

2024-07-31 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + help On 31.07.2024 10:48, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: Hi Danai, When compiling wftodm.c from the latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab package, I get a bunch of warnings with GCC 13 (see also below Lucas' output). To me, these seems just fairly benign warnings based on deprecated C89 c

Bug#1077073: texlive-bin FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14

2024-07-26 Thread Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2024-July/050773.html On 25.07.2024 21:18, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi, https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=texlive-bin&ver=2024.20240313.70630%2Bds-3 I've forwarded the issue for now. H. -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature.asc Des

Bug#1074343: src:texlive-bin: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue

2024-06-26 Thread Preuße
On 26.06.2024 22:25, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:texlive-bin has been trying to migrate for 31 days [2]. Hence, I am filing

Bug#1005961: nq,fq: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fq', which is also in package nq 0.3.1-4

2024-06-21 Thread Preuße
On 04.06.2024 17:29, Stephen Gelman wrote: On May 29, 2024 at 4:04:13 PM, Bastian Germann mailto:b...@debian.org>> wrote: Hi, I suggest fq renames the binary because it was introduced over 4 years later and has only been in one release so far. Both packages have very low usage acc to popcon

Bug#1072828: Work-around is ineffective on !amd64

2024-06-20 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-base Control: found -1 2024.20240401-2 Control: tags -1 + pending patch On 19.06.2024 13:19, Adrien Nader wrote: Hello, I found https://tug.org/svn/texlive?revision=71214&view=revision this morning. It only touches the win32 implementations however. I did somethin

Bug#1072828: Work-around is ineffective on !amd64

2024-06-18 Thread Preuße
On 18.06.2024 23:01, Adrien Nader wrote: Hi Adrien, I've straced the build and the file seems generated and I see some interesting things. I've heavily edited the output because the original is already 11M. The file is created and written to but it's in "/build/therion-oW9QKw/therion-6.2.1/bui

Bug#1072828: Work-around is ineffective on !amd64

2024-06-18 Thread Preuße
On 18.06.2024 15:26, Adrien Nader wrote: Hi Adrien, I hit that issue while working on the vtk9 9.3 transition in Ubuntu and I also tried to add 'texlive-fonts-recommended' as a dependency (at least temporarily so that the transition can finish). Unfortunately it only works on amd64. On arm64, a

Bug#1072682: luametatex: context 2024.04 and luametatex 2.11 no longer build PDF via Pandoc. (+ workaround)

2024-06-15 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 luametatex Control: tags -1 + pending On 06.06.2024 15:17, Gijs Hillenius wrote: Hello, Context 2024.04.01.20240428+dfsg-2 and Luametatex 2.11.02+ds-4 no longer let me build PDFs from Emacs Org-Mode files via Pandoc. After downgrading to luametatex 2.11.01 (from 2.11.02)

Bug#1072828: texlive-binaries upgrade breaks therion build

2024-06-08 Thread Preuße
On 08.06.2024 16:09, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi, https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=therion&arch=amd64&ver=6.2.1-1%2Bb1&stamp=1717847632&raw=0 ... FAILED: thbook/thbook.pdf /<>/build/thbook/thbook.pdf I can confirm that the failing command works fine on a normal computer..this is a ch

Bug#1071893: sagetex: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

2024-05-26 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 python3-ipywidgets Control: found -1 8.1.1-5 Control: affects -1 src:sagetex On 25.05.2024 19:22, Santiago Vila wrote: Hello, If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and affects, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this pa

Bug#1005961: nq,fq: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fq', which is also in package nq 0.3.1-4

2024-05-04 Thread Preuße
Control: found -1 fq/0.9.0-2 Control: found -1 nq/0.3.1-4 On 18.02.2022 08:39, Axel Beckert wrote: Hello, Trying to install fq fails for me as follows: Preparing to unpack .../archives/fq_0.0.4-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking fq (0.0.4-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/f

Bug#1061546: srcpd: installs file into aliased location

2024-04-19 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending On 26.01.2024 23:01, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: On 26.01.2024 09:35, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Hi, Please move /lib/udev/rules.d/10-liusb.rules into /usr/lib before srcpd reaches testing. hille42@hz:~/devel/srcpd$ dpkg-deb -c srcpd_2.1.6

Bug#1068419: perdition: dependencies unsatisfiable after binnmu for time64 transition.

2024-04-04 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + patch On 04.04.2024 21:57, Peter Green wrote: Hi, After being rebuilt for the time64 transition, perdition depends on both libvanessa-socket2 and libvanessa-socket2. As a result it is uninstallable. Interesting in this case, the uninstallability seems to apply to all archi

Bug#1066117: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev

2024-03-12 Thread Preuße
On 12.03.2024 21:59, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hi Aurelien, Starting with glibc 2.31, support for NIS (libnsl library) has been moved to a separate libnsl2 package. In order to allow a smooth transition, a libnsl-dev has been added to the libc6-dev package. This dependency has been temporarily dro

Bug#1064918: tex-common postinst script fails due to a bug in lua script /usr/bin/mtxrun.lua

2024-03-06 Thread Preuße
Control: affects -1 context,texlive-binaries Control: merge -1 1064402 On 06.03.2024 23:23, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: Control: severity -1 grave Control: reassign -1 luametatex Control: merge -1 1064402 Next try. H. -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature.asc Description

Bug#1064918: tex-common postinst script fails due to a bug in lua script /usr/bin/mtxrun.lua

2024-03-06 Thread Preuße
Control: affects -1 texlive-binaries,context Control: merge -1 1064402 On 06.03.2024 23:23, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: Control: severity -1 grave Control: reassign -1 luametatex Control: merge -1 1064402 Next try. H. -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature.asc Description

Bug#1065212: asymptote: recent libc6-dev change causes XDR and V3D support to be dropped

2024-03-01 Thread Preuße
On 01.03.2024 23:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hi Aurelien, This can be fixed by adding an explicit Build-Depends on libtirpc-dev. The glibc change will likely be reverted in the short term, but given its a change we want to do for Trixie, this will only lower the severity of the bug. I do not ful

Bug#1064854: Breaks tex-common's configuration

2024-02-26 Thread Preuße
Control: affects -1 texlive-binaries Control: merge -1 1064402 Control: affects -1 context OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1064854: Breaks tex-common's configuration

2024-02-26 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 luametatex Control: severity -1 grave Control: merge -1 1064402 Control: affects -1 context On 26.02.2024 18:50, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, since a few days, I saw a configuration issue with the tex-common package. (What I don't get is why it actually needs configur

Bug#1064402: texlive-binaries: tex-common configure: lua error : startup file: /bin/mtxrun.lua:2438: attempt to assign to const variable 'i'

2024-02-21 Thread Preuße
On 21.02.2024 16:15, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hi Vincent, Indeed, I can reproduce the problem on another machine, only with luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2: qaa:~> mtxrun --generate lua error : startup file: /bin/mtxrun.lua:2438: attempt to assign to const variable 'i' You'll see the failure in an upg

Bug#1061546: srcpd: installs file into aliased location

2024-01-26 Thread Preuße
On 26.01.2024 09:35, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Hi, Please move /lib/udev/rules.d/10-liusb.rules into /usr/lib before srcpd reaches testing. hille42@hz:~/devel/srcpd$ dpkg-deb -c srcpd_2.1.6-2_amd64.deb|grep usb -rw-r--r-- root/root 151 2024-01-26 21:45 ./usr/lib/udev/rules.d/10-liusb.

Bug#1058462: texlive-bibtex-extra: file conflict with liblatex-tounicode-perl on ltx2unitxt(1) manpage

2023-12-12 Thread Preuße
On 12.12.2023 14:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Hi Andreas, thanks for the report, I'll remove the manual page and the perl script from texlive-bibtex-extra . Hilmar during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files without

Bug#1058038: texlive-extra: Blocker bug

2023-12-11 Thread Preuße
On 11.12.2023 21:30, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:57:35PM +, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, Severity: normal This bug blocks the migration for now, I'll close it, once the other two packages tend to migrate. Pretty sure severity: normal does not block => raising.

Bug#1051243: This affects the build of the pspp package

2023-11-20 Thread Preuße
On 20.11.2023 13:11, Luca Boccassi wrote: Hi, This looks like an undeclared versioning dependency issue. If there are such constraints, please consider declaring them appropriately in the package control file by defining a dependency on the exact upstream version of zlib (e.g.: >= 1.3~ and << 1

Bug#1051243: This affects the build of the pspp package

2023-11-20 Thread Preuße
On 20.11.2023 10:43, Friedrich Beckmann wrote: Hi, i noticed a failure in our CI pipeline for pspp probably due to this bug. The problem occurs when I try to install "apt install texlive-plain-generic“. The install fails with A new package is on the way. Another adaption to zlib is needed,

Bug#1056186: texlive-binaries: zlib library mismatch

2023-11-18 Thread Preuße
On 18.11.2023 15:42, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hi, To clarify things, the message is not only irritating but also aborting: the package tex-common cannot currently configure. I'm aware of this: the other user reported a core dump and in our output an aborted message is visible. Therefore I'm afrai

Bug#1056183: Bug#1056186: texlive-binaries: zlib library mismatch

2023-11-18 Thread Preuße
On 18.11.2023 14:57, Jerome Benoit wrote: Hi, Hi, the issue appeared to me within a Sid schroot environment at postinstallation time of tex-common. I traced it back to texlive-binaries by looking the logfile at the fmutils stage. The issue seems to originate from the recent migration from zlib

Bug#1055901: [Pkg-raspi-maintainers] Bug#1055901: raspi-firmware: postinst fails, makes bad assumption about existence of /boot/firmware/

2023-11-13 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 11/13/23 23:20, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hilmar Preusse (2023-11-13): Hi, the package fails to install on my system. I simply assumes that /boot/firmware is a mount point and fails if this is not the case. If /boot/firmware is expected to be a mount point the installer should have created

Bug#1055901: Acknowledgement (raspi-firmware: postinst fails, makes bad assumption about existence of /boot/firmware/)

2023-11-13 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 11/13/23 23:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Hi, Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1055901: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055901. Here is the error message I get: hille@rasppi1:~ $ sudo apt -f install

Bug#1055111: ffmpeg FTBFS: makeinfo: Undefined subroutine &Texinfo::Config::set_from_init_file called at doc/t2h.pm

2023-10-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 10/31/23 17:21, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi, https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ffmpeg&ver=7%3A6.0-8 ... makeinfo --html -I doc --no-split -D config-not-all --init-file=/<>/doc/t2h.pm --output doc/ffmpeg.html /<>/doc/ffmpeg.texi makeinfo: error parsing /<>/doc/t2h.pm: Undefined subrou

Bug#1052048: texlive-bibtex-extra: Can't generate bibliography since last upgrade at trixie

2023-09-16 Thread Preuße
On 16.09.2023 17:16, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: Hello Mechtilde, After last update at trixie I can't proper build https://salsa.debian.org/ddp- team/dpb/ locally. It builds correct on trixie at the Salsa CI at 03.09.2023. The last upload to trixie was at 05.09.2023. Do you have some kind of lo

Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-04 Thread Preuße
On 04.09.2023 00:21, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: On 03.09.2023 07:20, Paul Gevers wrote: Hello Paul, I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one (and bug reports are filed). Thanks for

Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-03 Thread Preuße
On 03.09.2023 07:20, Paul Gevers wrote: Hello Paul, I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one (and bug reports are filed). Thanks for your response! When will the ignore hint be effective? Hilmar -- sigfault

Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-03 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries On 20.07.2023 00:06, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote: Hi, Upgrading tex-common seems to fail when attempting to rebuild formats (log attached). That issue is in texlive-binaries and has been solved there. H. -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP dig

Bug#1037510: texlive-lang-japanese: dangling symlinks due to missing dependencies

2023-06-15 Thread Preuße
On 13.06.2023 18:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hi Vincent, There is a dangling symlink on my machine: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/truetype/public/ipaex/ipaexm.ttf -> ../../../../../../fonts/opentype/ipaexfont-mincho/ipaexm.ttf This seems to be due to a missing dependency on fonts-ipaexfo

Bug#1035857: texlive-fonts-extra: broken font symlinks for junicode

2023-05-11 Thread Preuße
On 10.05.2023 11:18, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Hi again, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) broken symlinks: OK, had a closer look: the "Debian Fonts Task Force" replaced the "Junicode 1" by "Junicode 2" although they may behave differently "Users of the vari

Bug#1035857: texlive-fonts-extra: broken font symlinks for junicode

2023-05-10 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + bookworm-ignore On 10.05.2023 22:47, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 10/05/2023 22.24, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: Hi, 42a992dff6dd2b54ce0ffc10367a29913e062c0b, else there would be no upgrade path from bullseye to bookworm. I have to delay the fix to post-bookworm

Bug#1035857: texlive-fonts-extra: broken font symlinks for junicode

2023-05-10 Thread Preuße
On 10.05.2023 11:18, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Hello, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) broken symlinks: 3m10.3s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/truetype/public/junicode/Junicod -> ../../../../../../fonts/truetype/junicode

Bug#1035051: pssh: Fail to start

2023-04-28 Thread Preuße
On 28.04.2023 12:55, Christian Marillat wrote: Hi, Dear Maintainer, This version fail to send files with this error (Was working with 2.3.4-2): This happens (probably) b/c your hosts file contains a port specification. I've put a patched package on [1]. In my tests it solved the issue; could

Bug#1029913: Fwd: Bug#1029913: texlive-pictures: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/epspdf/epspdf.tlu: /tmp write vulnerability

2023-02-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 2/15/23 18:51, Frank Heckenbach wrote: Hi Frank, Of course, chdir into /tmp is a bit risky as any file creation before the next chdir would be susceptible to the same problem, but I assume you made sure this won't happen. BTW, when looked at the changes made, I noticed this: io.stdo

Bug#1029439: feynmf: FTBFS in bookworm (I can't open file `fmfsamp4')

2023-02-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 2/23/23 14:28, James Addison wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 12:53, James Addison wrote: Hi, pass: texlive-base (2022.20220605-1) unstable; urgency=low fail: texlive-base (2022.20220923-2) unstable; urgency=medium It should be possible to look at the differences between those (and ma

Bug#1029439: feynmf: FTBFS in bookworm (I can't open file `fmfsamp4')

2023-02-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 2/21/23 22:00, James Addison wrote: Hi all, I'm adding the 'help' tag to this bug, and am cc'ing the debian-tex-maint list, because it feels like extra brainpower could aid in figuring this one out more quickly. A brief recap of this bug so far, for folks reading the list: * the feynmf

Bug#1029913: texlive-pictures: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/epspdf/epspdf.tlu: /tmp write vulnerability

2023-02-15 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 29.01.2023 um 00:00 teilte Frank Heckenbach mit: Hello Frank, Package: texlive-pictures Version: 2020.20210202-3 Severity: grave File: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/epspdf/epspdf.tlu Classic /tmp write vulnerability: function dir_writable writes to "/tmp/1" (and if this fails, "/tmp

Bug#1030622: tex-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2023-02-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-base Control: tags -1 pending Am 06.02.2023 um 06:20 teilte Stéphane Glondu mit: Le 05/02/2023 à 20:52, Hilmar Preuße a écrit : Hi, Today the new texlive-base & texlive-extra did migrate to testing and hence were upgraded on your system. The texlive-

Bug#1030622: tex-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2023-02-05 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 05.02.2023 um 19:56 teilte Stéphane Glondu mit: Package: tex-common Version: 6.18 Severity: serious Hello, I got this when upgrading texlive today in testing: Paramétrage de tex-common (6.18) ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Running mtxrun --generate. This may take s

Bug#1029461: Processed (with 1 error): xemacs21-packages: FTBFS in bookworm (LaTeX Error: File `pdftexcmds.sty' not found)

2023-01-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-base Control: forcemerge -1 1029438 Am 31.01.2023 um 23:50 teilte Santiago Vila mit: Well, I feared the merge could fail, and yes, it did. I have not gotten the hang of it. If you could merge them properly, that would be great. Thanks a lot. -- sigfault

Bug#1029913: texlive-pictures: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/epspdf/epspdf.tlu: /tmp write vulnerability

2023-01-30 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: tags -1 + help Am 29.01.2023 um 00:00 teilte Frank Heckenbach mit: Hi, Classic /tmp write vulnerability: function dir_writable writes to "/tmp/1" (and if this fails, "/tmp/2" etc.) without sufficient checks. Harmless demonstration: % mkfifo /tmp/1 % epspdf /etc/hostname /dev/null #

Bug#1025985: glosstext: FTBFS: LaTeX Error: File `pdftexcmds.sty' not found.

2023-01-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: affects -1 src:glosstex

Bug#1015123: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2023-01-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 21.01.2023 um 16:05 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit: Hi Danai, Indeed, I have tested it yesterday too and the scripts now breeze through without bailing out. I would like to keep the bug, and will solve it by adding a versioned build-dependency on Fontforge to ensure it will always build prop

Bug#1015123: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2023-01-19 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 20.12.2022 um 04:08 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit: Hi, Sorry, I forgot all about this! I figured out it was a regression so in Unstable you need to go two versions back for Fontforge, which will ignore the warnings instead of halting the process. I'll be back home on 30 December. Meanwhile

Bug#1029127: context: manual has non-free files

2023-01-18 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 18.01.2023 um 20:29 teilte Bastian Germann mit: Am 18.01.23 um 20:20 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Am 18.01.2023 um 11:52 teilte Bastian Germann mit: Am 18.01.23 um 11:21 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Hi, Do you have a list of these files or do you know how to generate one? grep -r licence=cc-by-nc

Bug#1029127: context: manual has non-free files

2023-01-18 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 18.01.2023 um 11:52 teilte Bastian Germann mit: Am 18.01.23 um 11:21 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Hi, Do you have a list of these files or do you know how to generate one? grep -r licence=cc-by-nc-sa This gives a lot of TeX input files should I remove them? Hilmar -- sigfault

Bug#1029127: context: manual has non-free files

2023-01-18 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 18.01.2023 um 10:49 teilte Bastian Germann mit: Hi Bastian, Many of context's manual files contain licence=cc-by-nc-sa which is a non-free license (non-commercial). Please repack to get rid of them. Do you have a list of these files or do you know how to generate one? Thanks, Hilmar --

Bug#1025985: glosstext: FTBFS: LaTeX Error: File `pdftexcmds.sty' not found.

2023-01-11 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending Am 11.01.2023 um 02:48 teilte Adrian Bunk mit: Hi, Your package fails to build with: |Writing index file glosstex.idx |(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hypdoc/hypdoc.sty |(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/atveryend-ltx.sty) |(/usr/share/texlive/t

Bug#1028056: texlive-lang-chinese: xtuthesis.pdf still contains Lenna image

2023-01-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 06.01.2023 um 12:46 teilte Bastian Germann mit: Hi, The non-free Lenna image is stripped from the xtuthesis package via debian/tpm2deb.cfg. However, xtuthesis.pdf still contains the image and is actually a non-source file. So please exclude it as well. I've excluded the file (no "git push

Bug#1015123: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2022-12-19 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 27.07.2022 um 12:10 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit: Hi Danai, is there progress? Did you get response from upstream? Hilmar Some observations: Going back to fontforge version 20201107~dfsg-4 and its dependencies, I notice the following warning message: 21900/1114292: Add extrema...

Bug#1025980: texlive-extra breaks latexml autopkgtest: Couldn't convert t/structure/glossary.tex

2022-12-12 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 latexml Am 12.12.2022 um 21:56 teilte Paul Gevers mit: Hi Paul, With a recent upload of texlive-extra the autopkgtest of latexml fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of texlive-extra from unstable. It passes when run with only packages fro

Bug#1025980: texlive-extra breaks latexml autopkgtest: Couldn't convert t/structure/glossary.tex

2022-12-12 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reasssign -1 latexml Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1985 Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream pending Am 12.12.2022 um 21:56 teilte Paul Gevers mit: Hi Paul, With a recent upload of texlive-extra the autopkgtest of latexml fails in testing when that a

Bug#1021658: Processed: autopkgtest regressions are RC (and this one also blocks the perl transition)

2022-10-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 24.10.2022 um 19:48 teilte Paul Gevers mit: Hi all, I think Hilmar was afraid of what happens after latexml is removed from testing. Than TL migrates and breaks latexml for users of testing that don't immediately remove packages that are no longer in testing. Yes, correct. The idea to

Bug#1021658: Processed: autopkgtest regressions are RC (and this one also blocks the perl transition)

2022-10-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 22.10.2022 um 10:21 teilte Debian Bug Tracking System mit: Hi Adrian, the breakage is not caused by the perl upload, but due to the latest TeX Live upload at the beginning of this month. Hence TL either does not migrate to testing (which is good in the moment IMHO). I reported the issue up

Bug#1016272: transient bug in latex

2022-10-12 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 12.10.2022 um 11:22 teilte Cédric Boutillier mit: Hi, For the record, please find attached one of the latex files produced with kramdown which was causing the problematic character, together with the output of the failing compilation log with latex from texlive-latex-base/2022.20220722-1, an

Bug#1016272: transient bug in latex

2022-10-12 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: notfound -1 2022.20220923-1 Am 12.10.2022 um 11:22 teilte Cédric Boutillier mit: This bug seems caused by a transient bug due to a non-UTF8 character in one of the included files by latex(?). This problem was present with texlive-latex-base 2022.20220722-1, but after the recent upgrade

Bug#1016055: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in

2022-08-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 01.08.2022 um 09:22 teilte Klaus Ethgen mit: Am So den 31. Jul 2022 um 22:02 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Hi Klaus, This sounds like a full file system during installation, which can lead to various issues like this. I suggest to close the issue as "caused by full file system". Coul

Bug#1016323: gnuplot: FTBFS: dvips: DVI file can't be opened: gnuplot.dvi: No such file or directory

2022-07-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 src:gnuplot OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1016323: gnuplot: FTBFS: dvips: DVI file can't be opened: gnuplot.dvi: No such file or directory

2022-07-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 31.07.2022 um 15:38 teilte Adrian Bunk mit: Control: reassign -1 src:gnuplot Hi, It works after downgrading texlive-latex-base to 2022.20220605-1. Testcase: $ cat test.tex \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage{hyperref} \begin{document} . \end{document} Many tha

Bug#1016055: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in

2022-07-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 31.07.2022 um 15:50 teilte Klaus Ethgen mit: Hi, Some additional informations: Yesterday I found files from texlive-pictures with 0 bytes size. I reinstalled that package and the files have correct size now. This sounds like a full file system during installation, which can lead to variou

Bug#1016055: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in

2022-07-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 31.07.2022 um 12:15 teilte Klaus Ethgen mit: Hi, buf_size=10 xetex -ini -jobname=xelatex-dev -progname=xelatex-dev -etex xelatex.ini Successful run. I append the log file to the mail. Try to play with different values for buf_size. On [1] they speak about increasing the buf_size, mea

Bug#1016055: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in

2022-07-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 31.07.2022 um 10:57 teilte Klaus Ethgen mit: Hi, Could you send me /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf and the output of "ls -la /etc/texmf/texmf.d/"? ~> ls -la /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ insgesamt 4 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24 5. Sep 2021 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 124 28. Jun 2017 ..

Bug#1016055: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in

2022-07-31 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2022 um 09:16 teilte Klaus Ethgen mit: Hi, Sorry, late response: the mail did not make it into our mailing list, hence I noticed this bug by chance. fmtutil: running `xetex -ini -jobname=xelatex-dev -progname=xelatex-dev -etex xelatex.ini' ... This is XeTeX, Version 3.141592653-2

Bug#1015085: texworks-manual: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [Makefile:66: index.ind] Error 1

2022-07-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-plain-generic Control: tags -1 + pending Am 16.07.2022 um 15:56 teilte Lucas Nussbaum mit: Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. It was a bug in TeX4HT. I have a patch for this and will upload fixed packages soon. H

Bug#1015085: texworks-manual: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [Makefile:66: index.ind] Error 1

2022-07-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 22.07.2022 um 14:55 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Am 21.07.2022 um 00:20 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Am 16.07.2022 um 15:56 teilte Lucas Nussbaum mit: Hi During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. For now there is an MWE, which compiles fine using LaTeX

Bug#1015085: texworks-manual: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [Makefile:66: index.ind] Error 1

2022-07-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 21.07.2022 um 00:20 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Am 16.07.2022 um 15:56 teilte Lucas Nussbaum mit: Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. For now there is an MWE, which compiles fine using LaTeX but can't be processed using htlatex (that&#

Bug#1015085: texworks-manual: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [Makefile:66: index.ind] Error 1

2022-07-20 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 16.07.2022 um 15:56 teilte Lucas Nussbaum mit: Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. For now there is an MWE, which compiles fine using LaTeX but can't be processed using htlatex (that's what we try to do). I'll try to contact TeX people soon:

Bug#1012018: texlive-bin: FTBFS during separate binary-indep build

2022-06-03 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 28.05.2022 um 21:53 teilte Andreas Beckmann mit: Hi Andreas, Looks like you need to move some bits that are irrelevant for the binary-indep build to a override_dh_install-arch (or probably better execute_after_dh_install-arch) target. Many thanks for the pointer! I could separate the instal

Bug#1012018: texlive-bin: FTBFS during separate binary-indep build

2022-06-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 28.05.2022 um 21:53 teilte Andreas Beckmann mit: Hi, Looks like you need to move some bits that are irrelevant for the binary-indep build to a override_dh_install-arch (or probably better execute_after_dh_install-arch) target. Our build system did not change between TL 2021 & 2022. The only

Bug#1012018: texlive-bin: FTBFS during separate binary-indep build

2022-06-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 28.05.2022 um 21:53 teilte Andreas Beckmann mit: Hi Andreas, texlive-bin fails to build the arch-indep packages during a separate run as would be done by the buildds. Many thanks for the report! Unfortunately it came to me very late as the mailing list does not like large E-Mails containin

Bug#1008956: tex-common: Something in package "tex-common" causes dpkg to exit with exit code -1

2022-04-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 4/6/22 23:34, Ashleigh Moore wrote: Hi, Well, if the /tmp was full, would it have been able to generate the error logs in there? I did run the dpkg configure command like 4 or 5 times, and every time, it made a report.. Maybe there was enough space for the logs, but not for the format file

Bug#1008956: tex-common: Something in package "tex-common" causes dpkg to exit with exit code -1

2022-04-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 4/6/22 23:34, Ashleigh Moore wrote: Hi, Well, if the /tmp was full, would it have been able to generate the error logs in there? I did run the dpkg configure command like 4 or 5 times, and every time, it made a report.. Maybe there was enough space for the logs, but not for the format file

Bug#1008956: tex-common: Something in package "tex-common" causes dpkg to exit with exit code -1

2022-04-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 4/6/22 18:49, Ashleigh Moore wrote: Hi, Well uh, this is embarrassing, but apparently it fixed itself overnight. And since the machine rebooted since then, I no longer have the tmp files it made. I suppose if I have this occur again, I'll let you guys know? I am so sorry if this was a waste

Bug#1008956: tex-common: Something in package "tex-common" causes dpkg to exit with exit code -1

2022-04-05 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 05.04.2022 um 00:13 teilte Ashleigh Moore mit: Hi Ashleigh, I noticed the error that dpkg reported: exit code -1, and the package "tex-common". I saw that it made a error report with the name "fmtutil.", but I thought that perhaps it was a fluke brought on by the mammoth number of packages I

Bug#1005033: biber breaks rubber autopkgtest: There were errors running biber.

2022-02-05 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending Am 05.02.2022 um 21:29 teilte Paul Gevers mit: Hi, With a recent upload of biber the autopkgtest of rubber fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of biber from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular fo

Bug#1004671: incompatible with current biblatex version

2022-02-05 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 biber Control: found -1 2.17-1 Am 04.02.2022 um 22:42 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Control: reassign -1 texlive-bibtex-extra Control: found -1 2021.20211217-1 Control: tags -1 + pending Maybe leave it better on the biber package to make sure, people don't install the

Bug#1004671: incompatible with current biblatex version

2022-02-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-bibtex-extra Control: found -1 2021.20211217-1 Control: tags -1 + pending Am 31.01.2022 um 15:53 teilte Ryan Kavanagh mit: Hi, I'm not sure if this should instead be filed against texlive-bibtex-extra, but the current version of biber is incompatible with the bibla

Bug#1004671: incompatible with current biblatex version

2022-02-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/1202 Am 31.01.2022 um 15:53 teilte Ryan Kavanagh mit: Hi, I'm not sure if this should instead be filed against texlive-bibtex-extra, but the current version of biber is incompatible with the biblatex package currently in Debian unsta

Bug#1001785: texlive-extra affected by log4j CVEs

2021-12-18 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 16.12.2021 um 09:38 teilte Sven Mueller mit: Hi Sven, hi Norbert, texlive-extra-utils contains arara (https://github.com/islandoftex/arara) which was updated two days ago via TeX Live (https://www.tug.org/texlive/) which was updated slightly after that. Please update to the newest TeX Live A

Bug#1001785: texlive-extra affected by log4j CVEs

2021-12-17 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 16.12.2021 um 09:38 teilte Sven Mueller mit: Hi, texlive-extra-utils contains arara (https://github.com/islandoftex/arara) which was updated two days ago via TeX Live (https://www.tug.org/texlive/) which was updated slightly after that. Please update to the newest TeX Live ASAP, as arara in

Bug#1000710: ghostscript: Fails to convert EPS file using -sDEVICE=pngalpha

2021-11-29 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 27.11.2021 um 16:25 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: Hi all, Since gs 9.54 the conversion of some eps files does not work for at least one output devices. This came to my attention b/c the test suite of asymptote fails to run for at least one file. I got the information that the issue has been s

Bug#1000781: ghostscript breaks asymptote autopkgtest: build fails: GPL Ghostscript 9.55.0: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1

2021-11-28 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: reassign -1 ghostscript Control: severity 1000710 serious Control: merge 1000710 -1 Am 28.11.2021 um 21:29 teilte Paul Gevers mit: Hi Paul, Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of ghostscript the autopkgtest of asymptote fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the bi

Bug#998240: texlive: causes lgrind to FTBFS

2021-11-12 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 01.11.2021 um 14:32 teilte Andreas Beckmann mit: Hi, The offending line + some context: 537 % The meta-symbols and their meanings are: 538 % \begin{description} 539 % \item[\$] The end of a line 540 % \item[\^] The beginning of a line 541 % \item[$\backslash$d] A delimiter (space,

Bug#996620: FTBFS: error: cannot bind non-const lvalue reference of type ‘temp_string&’ to an rvalue of type ‘temp_string’

2021-10-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending Am 16.10.2021 um 12:49 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: Source: wp2latex Version: 3.100-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: 4. Dear Maintainer, the package fails to build from source since gcc-11 is the default compiler: Patch is on salsa, tag pending. H.

Bug#993164: proftpd-core: When upgrading from Buster to Bullseyes, the installation of ProFTPd fails

2021-09-03 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 31.08.2021 um 12:53 teilte Andreas Günther mit: Hi Andreas, but I realized that now. The whole time the installer was bothered by a line in "/etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf", namely "IdentLookups off". I commented on this line and thus everything could be reinstalled and started successfully. Hm

Bug#993164: proftpd-core: When upgrading from Buster to Bullseyes, the installation of ProFTPd fails

2021-08-30 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 30.08.2021 um 10:16 teilte Andreas Günther mit: Hi, I have now deleted everything again dpkg -r proftpd-core proftpd-basic proftpd-mod-crypto proftpd-mod-wrap and downloaded all the necessary packages and try to install them in order. First the package proftpd-core_1.3.7a + dfsg-12_amd64.d

Bug#993164: proftpd-core: When upgrading from Buster to Bullseyes, the installation of ProFTPd fails

2021-08-29 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 8/29/21 10:12 AM, Andreas Günther wrote: Am Samstag, 28. August 2021, 17:09:37 CEST schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Hi, Hmm, weird: the modules in question should be provided by proftpd-mod-wrap & proftpd-mod-crypto, should should have installed. Could you check if the files /usr/lib/pro

Bug#993164: proftpd-core: When upgrading from Buster to Bullseyes, the installation of ProFTPd fails

2021-08-28 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 28.08.2021 um 16:46 teilte Andreas Günther mit: Hi, please keep the bug in Cc. here I have the output from systemctl status proftpd.service: proftpd.service - ProFTPD FTP Server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/proftpd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed

  1   2   3   >