ote:
> > On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 23:18:50 + Debian FTP Masters
> > wrote:
> > > Source: pcp
> > > Source-Version: 5.3.4-1
> > > Done: Nathan Scott
> > >
> >
> > Unfortunately, the solution didn't seem to work. piuparts still failed
Hi Sunil,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:52 AM Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 16:51:46 +1000 Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Hi Petter,
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 4:45 PM Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > [...] This approach is known as multilevel confi
Hi Petter,
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 4:45 PM Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [...] This approach is known as multilevel configuration.
>
> I recommend it over modifying conffiles in /etc/.
I'll discuss with other upstream folks and see if we can transition
to this style of solution & for all distros.
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:55 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> [...]
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'testing'.
> It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declari
Hi Dom,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 7:01 AM Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 12:35:04AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > This package FTBFS on the architectures which don't have bpftrace as a
> > dependency since:
>
> ...
>
> Also, if you do do another upload, please can you
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:56 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> Package: pcp
> Version: 5.2.1-1
> [...]
> But the "bpftrace" package only exists on a few architectures [1]. This is
> what
> makes the package uninstallable and prevents testing migration [2].
>
> Please fix
> that at least by restricting th
Hi folks,
Apologies for the slow response - yes, I'm around but not with alot of
time for packaging work unfortunately. I appreciate all the help!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:06 PM Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>
> This bug was already addressed in the past by Marco d'Itri. Now it reappears.
Yes,
Hi Martin, Sunil, all,
Thanks for looking into this issue while we were all off, Martin and Sunil!
To summarise where I understand things are at now: Martin's uploaded
a pcp package for rebuild which drops the python2 build steps. I think
this is fine and solves the immediate, pressing issue.
T
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:48 AM Martin Pitt via Groups.Io
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just checked that python-pcp has zero reverse build and binary dependencies,
> so it's fine to just drop it and thus fix this RC bug. If you don't have time,
> I'm happy to do an NMU for this (as cockpit
- Original Message -
> [...]
> lots of files in man/*, book/* and images/* are licensed under some
> version of CC.
> Please remove all files from the tarball that use a DFSG incompatible
> license and mention the others in your debian/copyright.
OK, will do. I see a mix of CC-SA versio
Hi Jakub,
- Original Message -
> [...]
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libpcp-pmda-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.18.2 but it is not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Oh, I have an outdated perl installation here - have upgraded it
Hi Xilin,
Thanks for the fix! I wont have a chance to upload for another
two weeks, so please go ahead with the pcp-3.9.6+nmu1 NMU shown
in your patch.
I'll ensure your patch is also included in pcp-3.9.7.
Thanks again.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debi
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I see this ps error too on my box, version 3.9.4. Can it be overcome to
> try building until 3.9.5 is out? I suspect there are issues with make
> 4.0 too.
The fix is in git://git.performancecopilot.org/pcp dev branch - it would
be great if you could use th
- Original Message -
> [...]
> it ususally should happen automatically, but it probably didn't in this case
> since pcp-gui-testsuite isn't provided by the pcp source package.
>
> See [1] for how to request removals.
>
Thanks Ralf, bug #749556 has been opened for the ftpmasters.
--
Na
Hi Aurelien,
- Original Message -
> The configure script tries to find systemd in /bin/systemd, while ps -ef
> show a different path:
>
> $ ps -ef | grep systemd
> root 1 0 0 avril30 ? 00:00:01 /lib/systemd/systemd --system
> --deserialize 22
Ah, there's that informatio
- Original Message -
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:41:36PM -0400, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Hi Aurelien,
> >
> > | On i386, pcp ships the upstream binary src/pmdas/mmv/mmvdump into
> > | /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mmv/mmvdump without rebuilding it. This violates
>
Hi Ralf,
- Original Message -
> Package: pcp-gui-testsuite
> Version: 1.5.13
> Severity: serious
> User: trei...@debian.org
> Usertags: edos-outdated
>
> Hi,
>
> pcp-gui-testsuite is no longer installable in sid as it depends on
> pcp-gui (= 1.5.13). Since pcp-gui moved into the pcp sour
Hi,
The configure script does appear to look at /bin/systemd when
"ps -ef" is used ... can you send me the output from "ps -ef"
from this system? (privately if you prefer, it might contain
confidential info not for the bts).
Thanks!
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ..
Hi Aurelien,
| On i386, pcp ships the upstream binary src/pmdas/mmv/mmvdump into
| /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mmv/mmvdump without rebuilding it. This violates
| Debian policy and might be used by upstream to introduce backdoors or
| other security issues.
What gives that impression? It seems to not be
Thanks Thorsten,
- Original Message -
> [...]
> please add the missing MIT and BSD licenses of files in
>pcp-3.9.0/src/pmwebapi/jsdemos/*
These are dual licensed under the already documented GPL
license used for the rest of this package, so I reasoned
(possibly incorrectly?) this was
3.8.8 has been uploaded to address this, finally, hopefully. :(
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Mathieu,
- Original Message -
> ...
> -I../../../src/include/pcp -c -o trace.o trace.c
> trace.c:19:20: fatal error: probes.h: No such file or directory
> #include "probes.h"
> ^
> compilation terminated.
>
> Please fix this soon as this is preventing ctdb migra
- Original Message -
> ...
> Full build logs:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pcp&suite=sid
>
> Feel free to contact debian-bsd@ (cc'd) if you need help.
>
Thanks - this is fixed upstream, expected to arrive in pcp-3.8.5
(later this week, hopefully).
cheers.
--
Nath
Thanks for pushing this through Adam...
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libpcp-import-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.12.4 but it is not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> ...
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Adam D. Ba
Hi Robert,
On 20 April 2012 05:46, Robert Millan wrote:
> tags 669307 patch
> thanks
>
> El 19 d’abril de 2012 20:31, Robert Millan ha escrit:
>> It's missing indeed. Problem fixed in glibc-bsd SVN (rev 4209).
>
> Besides, a few more fixes are needed to build pcp on GNU/kFreeBSD.
>
> Please cou
Fabulous - thanks Robert!!! That patch will be in pcp-3.6.3 which
I'll test & upload in the next few days.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Thanks for reporting the (new) build problem (again), Christoph!
> freebsd.c: In function 'kmemread_init':
> freebsd.c:425:10: warning: variable 'sts' set but not used
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> freebsd.c: In function 'freebsd_fetchCallBack':
> freebsd.c:522:35: error: dereferencing poi
Upstream is downstream and vice-versa. For convenience of the
developers, PCP is intentionally packaged in this way.
Thanks for taking time to submit the report (and also for the init script
failure bug) - we appreciate it.
cheers.
--
Nathan
Hi Christoph,
Might be missing libbsd support for that
>
> Full build log at
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pcp&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=3.6.1&stamp=1334211209
>
>
Thanks, yeah looks like a build dependency on libkvm-dev is needed.
PCP 3.6.2 is pending, I'll get a new version
On 17 January 2012 07:35, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> reopen 654616
> thanks
>
> Still fails on all arches.
>
Ugh, I overlooked something - new upload shortly - thanks for letting me know!
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
On 11 January 2012 09:57, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:35 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
>
>> Not 100% sure what you mean ... do you mean rename pcp.conf to
>> something including the library version? Ah, I see - the underlying
>> issue is thi
Thanks Julien,
On 11 January 2012 05:49, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 13:32:18 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
>
> > On 10 January 2012 09:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > Note that the presence of /etc/pcp.conf in libpcp3 is a RC
On 10 January 2012 09:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> Note that the presence of /etc/pcp.conf in libpcp3 is a RC bug of its
> own.
>
Oh... hmm ... signficant parts of it (libpcp API) wont work without it
though, whats the prefered approach there?
thanks.
--
Nathan
On 5 January 2012 11:56, peter green wrote:
> tags 654616 +patch
> thanks
>
> Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
>> pcp-gui FTBFS on all arches, due to broken configure script:
>>
> More specficially it fails because the configure script fails
> to find /etc/pcp.env which is provided by package pcp
Hi,
On 15 November 2011 17:18, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00:50PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Hi Aurelien,
> >
> > On 15 November 2011 08:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This new version basically replaced the
Hi Aurelien,
On 15 November 2011 08:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> This new version basically replaced the build-depends on
> libreadline-gplv2-dev
> by a build-depends on
> libreadline5-dev | libreadline-gplv2-dev
>
> Given libreadline5-dev is not in the archive, the package can't be
> built,
- Original Message -
> Package: pcp
> Version: 3.4.0
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pcp
>
Thanks Julien - I have a fix, will get it uploaded soon.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
- "Julien Cristau" wrote:
> qt 4.7 removed libqtassistantclient, so you now need
> libqtassistantclient-dev.
Thanks, I'll get that fixed up.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
- "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on
> amd64.
> ...
> > === chart ===
> > === views ===
> > make[4]: Nothing to be done for `default'.
> > /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 && /usr/bin/make -f Makefile
> > /usr/bin/uic-qt4 aboutdialo
- "Petter Reinholdtsen" wrote:
> [Nathan Scott]
> > > and the package fail to install in unstable now.
> >
> > Can you describe this in more detail? It installs OK for me... I
> > must be missing something, of course - what is no longer
> f
Hi Petter,
- "Petter Reinholdtsen" wrote:
> ...
> [Nathan Scott]
> > Thanks Petter, your patch looks fine to me. I'll merge it upstream
> > and get it into the next PCP release (hopefully later this week).
>
> The new version 3.0.0 introduced br
- "Nathan Scott" wrote:
> I also have another package which uses AC_PROG_LEX without issues, so
> I'm keen to understand further what you mean above - can you give more
> details please?
Ah, I understand the problem now. It seems the latest versions of
autoconf/m
- "Chris Lamb" wrote:
> tags 539373 + patch
> thanks
>
> Patch attached.
>
> Problem arises from incorrect use of AC_PROG_LEX and --acdir instead
> of
> AM_PROG_LEX and -I.
Thanks. I don't really understand your analysis though, and this seems
to introduce some warnings when running conf
- "Philipp Kern" wrote:
> > === debian ===
> > make[2]: Entering directory
> `/build/buildd-pcp_2.8.4-hppa-foVPoK/pcp-2.8.4/debian'
> > ../install-sh -o root -g root -m 755 -d /usr/share/doc/pcp-2.8.4
> > ../install-sh -o root -g root -m 644 changelog
> /usr/share/doc/pcp-2.8.4/changelog.Debi
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 16:11 +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Package: pcp
> Version: 2.7.8-20090217
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Thanks for reporting it Peter, I think I can see the cause - I'll
upload a fixed version in the next few days.
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:48 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: pcp
> Version: 2.7.8-20081201
> Severity: serious
>
> Heya,
>
> Building your package failed on my buildd:
Thanks Marc,
Ah, I can see what that is - works for me cos I have those
headers installed in my root. I'll upl
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 08:51 +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Monday 08 September 2008 02:30:21 Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 10:55 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > No, since this is not targeted for lenny, we are not plannign
> > > currently upload
> &g
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 10:55 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
>
> No, since this is not targeted for lenny, we are not plannign
> currently upload
> it to unstable.
Hmmm... but its a bugfix release isnt it? Moving from
4.3 to 4.4 introduced several regressions in just my
one app, I'd expect others h
Package: qt4-x11
Version: 4.4.1-1
Severity: serious
I'm trying to install the 4.4.1 packages from experimental, to see if
483790 is really resolved for my app, and I'm struggling - it kinda,
sorta, maybe looks like a packaging botch in libqtcore4 vs libqtgui4?
Below is what I see from dpkg... (whi
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 02:22 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Package: kmchart
> Version: 1.2.6
> Severity: serious
>
> Kmchart fails to build on mips/mipsel, and I believe it will also fail
> on any other architecture. The reason is a missing build dependency on
> libqt4-opengl-dev. This used to be i
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 22:08 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi Riki,
>
> >> curve.cpp: In static member function 'static double Curve::NaN()':
> >> curve.cpp:35: error: 'numeric_limits' is not a member of 'std'
> >> curve.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'double'
> >
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 08:27 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: kmchart
> Version: 1.2.4
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kmchart-1.2.4'
> > src/include/builddefs:22: /etc/pcp.conf: No such
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 10:33 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: kmchart
> Version: 1.1.5
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Thanks Martin, I'll get this fixed up today.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 12:35 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:53:36PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Let me know if you want a Conflicts: line in the pcp
> > package... or some other strategy for sorting this out.
>
> Thanks fo
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 01:50 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The problem is probably with librapi2-tools (my package).
> I'll sort this and upload it ASAP.
Hi Jonny,
Let me know if you want a Conflicts: line in the pcp
package... or some other strategy for sorting this out.
cheers.
--
Na
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 01:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:11:01 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
>
> > Any answer to my earlier question here? Is this reproducible?
> > I'm wondering why it only fails on s390 (and also whether its
> > a bug i
Any answer to my earlier question here? Is this reproducible?
I'm wondering why it only fails on s390 (and also whether its
a bug in whatever dh_install version you have there).
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 13:50 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: pcp
> Version: 2.7.4-20080317
> Severity: serious
t
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 13:50 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of pcp_2.7.4-20080317 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
> [...]
> > dh_compress
> > dh_fixperms
> > dh_install --sourcedir=debian/pcp
> > cp: cannot stat
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 17:53 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: pcp
> Version: 2.7.4-20080306
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 02:28 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> On Thursday 28 February 2008, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Been discussing this with the SGI guys. The problem is most likely
> > to be that current mkfs.xfs enables
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:32 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > After downgrading to version 2.9.4-1, a newly created partition could be
> > mounted again.
>
> 2.9.5-1 works correctly as well.
Hi all,
Been discussing this with the SGI guys. The problem i
Hi Barry!
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:21 +1100, Barry Naujok wrote:
>
> Yes, xfs_repair 2.8.11 has an nlink counting bug. Must get xfsprogs
> 2.9.6
> (unstable or testing?), run xfs_metadump to capture an image which can
> be
> sent to me to fix the SEGV bug is xfs_check and then run xfs_repair
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 22:42 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: xfsprogs
> Version: 2.8.11-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
Heh, er, just a tad extreme? (its not clear how an xfs_check SEGV
can "break the whole system"...?)
> I have a filesystem which causes a S
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 23:49 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Thanks Paul, I've initiated a discussion with upstream, will get
> > back to you soon. Sorry about the delay, been away over Easter.
>
> What's the outcome?
My timing sucks; I&#
Thanks Paul, I've initiated a discussion with upstream, will get
back to you soon. Sorry about the delay, been away over Easter.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:22 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:57:00PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Hmm, my upload got rejected for some version ... I've sent off some
> > mail to try figure out why.
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 03:
Hi Andi,
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 08:55 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Nathan, it is really not the right moment to exchange core libraries.
Understood. I certainly didn't want to be uploading anything at this
time. :|
> There is already a fixed version uploaded, and I would propose that you
> just
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:36 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
>
> Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
> uploaded later today, a
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
uploaded later today, as soon as I'm able.
cheers.
--
Nathan
John,
Take a deep breath. Please start a discussion with the maintainer
before attempting an NMU, its generally considered courteous to
give more than 45 mins notice (which was the time between this
bug and your NMU problem report).
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 11:23 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Packag
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 04:00:24PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> xfsdump doesn't build on alpha and ia64:
Ah, this is a build dependency issue - a newer version of the
xfslibs-dev package needs to be used - I'll get that fixed up.
> BTW, is there a reason to build with -O1 instead of -O2 as polic
Hi there,
Revisiting this one, again. Firstly, since we've had no other
people reporting having hit this issue, I plan to downgrade this
from a "critical" bug... I assume if it was happening to everyone
the arm port would be unusable, certainly that would be critical;
and we'd probably have made
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:30:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:29:54PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Recompiling libacl1 (itself an awkward task since the package itself
> > > segfaults in the middle when it is doing so
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> ...
> Recompiling libacl1 (itself an awkward task since the package itself
> segfaults in the middle when it is doing something to the postinst script)
> and installing the recompiled version fixes the problem.
Given this sta
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:56:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:58:02AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Anything specific you're looking for there Steve?
>
> + arm: upgrade doesn't work with 2.2, but can work with 2.4.24 or above.
>
Hi there,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:39:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> > I've just upgraded my system from woody to sarge. Among other upgrade
> > problems I noticed that programmes like cp, mv and install were
> > occ
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:37:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 305055 dmapi,xfslibs-dev
> tags 305055 sid
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:24:37PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > Package: dmapi
> > Version: 2.2.0-1
> > Severity: serious
>
> > building the package dmapi in a cle
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:07:33PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Package: xfsprogs
> > Version: 2.6.26-1
> > Severity: grave
>
> > This package seems to be not built on unstable, libhandle requests
> > executable stack, while a un
78 matches
Mail list logo
