On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:59:31AM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I wonder whether this is still an issue, given that enigmail now builds
> on mipsel again, see related log:
It builds fine because mozilla-devscripts (a build-dep of enigmail) no
longer depends on this package.
Rdflib 3.0.0 is on i
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Willi Mann wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> RDFLib 3.0.0 was recently released. Thus, before uploading a patched
>> debian/rules, I'd like to test whether this issue is reproducible with
>> the new version as well. I'm preparing a package, it would be great if
>> yo
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Willi Mann wrote:
> tag 584327 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi!
Hi
>
> Attached is a patch for debian/rules that reduces the optimization level
> to 1 for mipsel and mips, which fixes the problem at least on mipsel.
> (tested, not tested on mips). I would be nice if you c
Hey again,
The question about Qemu is in fact very silly, because I didn't realize
it wasn't working in the build daemons as well.
I'm sorry about the noise.
Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
Hey,
Thanks for reporting. At the first glance, these are my (probably
wrong) thoughts:
As expected, it works well here (amd64, python2.6, rdflib 2.4.2-1+b1).
Your debug steps are clear, but I'm not really sure if python-rdflib
is the one to blame here. "Bus error" looks more like an internal
Py
tags 493432 + confirmed
thanks
Hey,
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 10:54:01AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libsvn-notify-perl
> Version: 2.77-1
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
Yes, it fails. The chroot where I built the package had
exim4-daemon-light erroneously install
reassign 468250 buxon
tags 468250 + pending
tags 468251 + pending
thanks
Both bugs will be fixed with the upcoming release of Buxon.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Updated patch attached.
>
>
> I wonder what the second part of this is good for:
>
> if (Bins.empty() == true || Bins.length() >= 102400)
> return 0;
>
> Oh, well that's a high enough number that it probably won't be(come)
> a real world problem and if w
tags 395548 + confirmed upstream
tags 393823 + confirmed upstream
merge 395548 393823
thanks bts
--
bye,
- Nacho
http://criptonita.com/~nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:11:03 +0200
Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: zinc-compiler
> Version: 1.0.2-6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> zinc-compiler FTBFS with the n
tags 374173 - help
tags 374173 + patch pending
thanks
The attached patch should fix this bug, thanks to Diego Berrueta, the
upstream author.
Next upload will close #374173.
--
bye,
- Nacho
# Fixing #374173
# Thanks to Diego Berrueta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ur zinc-compiler-1.0.2.orig
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:35:24 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great! So the previous patch manedit.diff is not needed? I believe drag and
> drop could crash without it, but this is not related to this bug.
It seems to work without this patch at the moment, but i only tested it
tags 384585 + patch
thanks
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:05:21 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, thanks. Could you please try the attached patch? It tries to
> avoid the problem you're facing.
Congratulations, i applied it to a clean source tree and it works for
me. Now, i ca
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:43:21 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, thanks.
You are welcome.
--- snip ---
>
> On the binary built with debugging symbols, that would give something
> like:
>
> (gdb) b main.c:398
> Breakpoint 1 at ...: file main.c, line 398.
> (gdb) r
>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:16:59 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:06:18PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > #0 0x2b78e4d943f0 in gtk_style_init (style=0x826780,
> > colormap=0x6dd870, depth=)
> > at gtkstyle.
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:02:44 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:54:18AM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x2b9f5159a3f0 in gtk_paint_hline () fr
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:44:04 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- 8< ---
>
> Well, somehow that did not work. Can you please retry with
> /manedit-0.6.1/manedit/manedit?
>
> Thomas
Come on!
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2b9f5159a3f0 in gtk_paint_h
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:29:12 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:12:06AM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > Done. I just applied the attached patch to a clean 0.6.1-2 source tree
> > and compiled it in a c
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:26:48 +0200
Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Thomas,
>
> I can't reproduce this problem on my i386 box. But according to the
> report, the bug can only be seen on an amd64. Having a look at the
> buildd log[1] reveals that gcc complains a log ab
tags 374173 + help
thanks
Upstream needs help to solve this bug. He doesn't know why post linking
process fails.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I updated my unstable system today. This problem appeared before and
after the upgrade.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: manedit
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I experienced this strange situation on my AMD64 machine:
Manedit runs nice without ~/.maneditrc file (i.e. the first time
the application is used), but, later, when a RC file has been generated:
I continue without news from upstream, he told me weeks ago, that he is
experiencing similar problems with other applications and the last
versions of ghc6 and their libraries.
I think he is still working on it, but he hasn't a lot of free time to
work in this bug.
Continuing waiting for upstream
Received ping replies from upstream, he promised that the next week
he will work in this bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 matches
Mail list logo