products for US
governments in reference to non-copyright restrictions -- export
controls, sensitive or classified information, proprietary content,
and so forth. Because of that, I would not consider it a reliable
statement about the applicable copyright license.
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
S. Copyright Act calls a "useful article".) Why do you say it
is non-distributable in the first place?
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it is free) from outside
> > > Debian for ndiswraper. That makes it contrib imho.
> >
> > Are there any free MSWord files in main ? No ? Then please move
> > antiword and similar tools to contrib.
>
> *points at abiword and openoffice.org*
Those are (arguably) differe
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:59:07AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
> > Anthony Towns writes:
> > > But even if that weren't the case, nasm is an assembler -- it doesn't
> > > rely on assembler code to do anything useful, its purpose
g drivers to run on Linux.
This apparently means that you object to translation at the binary
level but not translation at the source level. I guess that's
reasonable in a general sense, it's just not a distinction that policy
or the DFSG makes.
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
that policy requires.
You are the one who insists that the execution must be "free, non-toy,
non-POC", and that is why I said that if you want to change the state
of things, you should revise the DFSG or policy.
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o push against ndiswrapper is a
grudge.)
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo
