epted/pushed by Christoph.
BTW, Christophe recently mentioned release plans on the mailing list
("[dm-devel] Next release plans?"), catching up with inbox around the
"summer holidays", but I don't know which timeframe that actually is.
Maybe those patches get in too.
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 12:21 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> No. It has nothing to do with the patch.
>
> These days I don't work on storage, i.e. don't have a team that spends
> the time on these tools. So I keep the upstream first policy, for now.
> Even my patch (kpartx) is very trivial but 'v
Hi Ritesh,
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 23:40 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> OKay!! THanks. I'll put this one on hold then. The other one, is already
> ready for Unstable. And as I write, I'm also preparing the same for
> Jessie+U1.
Thanks!
Do you think it would be a problem to include the patch?
A
e
to check/acknowledge it, so we may have an idea if that's eventually
going upstream or requires more changes, before including in Debian.
Thanks!
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi Ritesh,
On 04/21/2015 10:14 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Saturday 11 April 2015 04:29 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
May you please consider the attached patch for an upload for jessie?
Sorry. I haven't been on top of it. I'll push it for unstable for now.
Later we&
562524 4828280 243424548 2% /
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
;-boot' multipath-tools).
With that patch for sg3-utils and the attached patch, the SCSI devices
are not anymore blacklisted by default.
May you please consider them for an upload to jessie? Thanks!
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
diff -Nru multipath-too
.
Thanks!
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
diff -Nru multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
--- multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog 2015-04-13 05:26:21.0
+0530
+++ multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog 2015-04
On 04/11/2015 01:00 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Tags: patch
It helps to attach the patch :)
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
diff -Nru multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
--- multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
y
IBM,IPR-0 5EC
+1IBM_IPR-0_5EC94780 1:2:3:0 sdj 8:144 10 undef ready
IBM,IPR-0 5EC
+1IBM_IPR-0_5EC94760 1:2:4:0 sdk 8:160 10 undef ready
IBM,IPR-0 5EC
+1IBM_IPR-0_5EC99A000430 1:2:5:0 sdl 8:176 10 undef ready
IBM,IPR-0 5EC
<...>
--
Control: tags -1 patch
Oops, forgot the patch tag.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.0
-0300
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+multipath-tools (0.5.0-6pathselector1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * initramfs/hooks: include dm-service-time in initramfs (new default path
selector).
+
+ -- Mauricio Faria de Oliveira Fri, 10 Apr 2015
14:51:30 -0300
+
multipath-tools (0.5.0-6) unstabl
educational. Thanks, Cyril.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 03/04/2015 08:32 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
d-i images are built weekly. So, if the unblock goes through, it'll
migrate into testing, and then the next d-i weekly snapshot should
include it.
Got it. Thanks.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBS
uld please educate me:
For it to reach the d-i Packages file (so it's available for installs),
does it require a d-i rebuild, or it's an automatic process?
(I'm unsure; there's no multipath-udeb listed in d-i build log.)
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
On 03/04/2015 06:43 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (2015-03-03):
>(BTW, espeakup-udeb is broken too; that approach no longer works.)
(JFTR: espeakup certainly runs properly in the netboot-gtk mini.iso when
selecting speech synthesis.)
Ah, thanks for clarifying
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi Siresh,
On 03/03/2015 08:32 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Sure, I can try and should send a patch soon.
I've modified the build-arch target to build multipath-udeb first,
and store its output in a different directory; and the install target
to use tha
Cyril, thanks for the /very clear/ pointers to the problem/solution. :)
Ritesh,
On 03/03/2015 04:26 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Will you be in a position to try out the changes that Cyril has proposed ?
Sure, I can try and should send a patch soon.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux
Package: src:cernlib
FYI, the build w/ the mentioned patch finishes succesfully on ppc64el.
(log attached)
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
cernlib-20061220+dfsg3-ppc64el1_ppc64el.build.xz
Description: application/xz
w/ it for your convenience.
I can confirm the comparison of debian/control{ , .new} is now passing.
Currently it would fail as in [1]
Thanks!
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cernlib&arch=ppc64el&ver=20061220%2Bdfsg3-4&stamp=1408774563
--
Mauricio Faria de O
WARNING: Failed to read mirror file
WARNING: Failed to read mirror file
WARNING: Failed to read mirror file
WARNING: Failed to read mirror file
WARNING: Failed to read mirror file
WARNING: Failed to read mirror file
Package: src:python-apt
Please note a patch for another current test-suite failure reported on
#759500.
Thanks,
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
8.31/.libs # this line.
So I would think the problematic old package built something
wrong into .libs/. The same command is executed in the new
environment, but the test-suite passes with no failures.
Thanks,
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
set 14
---
> Failed: regular expression is too large at offset 15
5803c5806
< Failed: number too big in {} quantifier at offset 15
---
> Failed: numbers out of order in {} quantifier at offset 15
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
d: regular expression is too large at offset 15
/(){2,4294967295}/I
-Failed: number too big in {} quantifier at offset 15
+Failed: numbers out of order in {} quantifier at offset 15
[...]
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
25 matches
Mail list logo
