Bug#436385: maxdb-7.5.00: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libc6.1-dev

Hi, opening of this bug coincided with the upload of the new packages that fixed the problem. The current package version 7.5.00.44-2 builds fine. Best wishes, Martin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#388106: maxdb-webtools: postinst failure (error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6)

Hi, I have successfully built and tested a new MaxDB version with NPTL support for i386. Currently I am waiting for my sponsor to upload a new version of the maxdb-buildtools package which is a prerequisite for an upload of the fixed MaxDB packages. Best wishes, Martin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Bug#422015: FTBFS: 'CLK_TCK' undeclared

Hi Martin, Thanks for reporting. This is already fixed in the upload I am currently preparing. Best wishes, Martin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#409463: maxdb-7.5.00: FTBFS: 'scriptall.mac' not made because of dependency errors

Hi, Thanks for reporting this bug. The current version of python-all-dev does not include the dependencies on python2.3-dev any more which results in the build failure. I will add a fix shortly. Best wishes, Martin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#378305: maxdb-7.5.00: FTBFS: 'libsqlod.dld' not made because of dependency errors

Hi Julien, I just noticed this last night. The actual error is a problem with gcc-4.1: vpa01c.c: In function 'pa01CompareKeywordW': vpa01c.c:1318: fatal error: internal consistency failure compilation terminated. Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/buildd/maxdb-7.5.00-7.5.00.34/MaxDB_DEV/tmp/cc9

Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation?

Hi, just a quick update of the situation: Upstream is still using Word documents as the basis for the HTML docs. I have asked about the possibility of a license exemption but am not expecting an answer anytime soon. This still leaves the discussion open as to whether the HTML would qualify as th

Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation?

Hi Guido, Guido Trotter wrote: > I've been asked by the debian release team to look into this bug and see what > can be done to have a successful resolution. Thanks for taking the initiative. I have been thinking of asking for advice on this bug on debian-devel, but so far just couldn't get mysel

Bug#346354: Processed: distribution of this package is likely a GPL violation

Hi Florian, as far as I know the actual upstream 'source code' is MS-Word, so I don't know if one were better of with a proprietary format. Given the fact that HTML can still be processed with simple text processing tools I have no problem to take this at least as 'some sort of' source code e

Bug#346354: Processed: Re: Bug#346354: distribution of this package is likely a GPL violation

Hi, upstream is providing the html files under the GPL. They are not providing the files the html is generated from, but since they are the copyright owners, they are free to release the files in any format they like (and any license they like). So regarding the maxdb-doc package, there is n

Bug#341510: libsqldbc76-dev: postinst failure (dhelp)

Hi Laurent, I have noticed this myself. It is due to the fact that the documentation for libsqldbc cannot be generated at the moment due to some missing files in the upstream tarball. I will have to remove the dhelp entry for the time being. Thanks for reporting the problem. Best wishes, M

Bug#336278: FTBFS: No match for operator<

Hi, I can confirm the bug and will prepare a workaround. There must have been some changes with one of the latest gcc releases that make the compiler pickier. At the time of the upload the compilation process had no problems... Thanks for reporting this bug. Best wishes, Martin. -- To UN