Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-06-08T08:47:41, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >There may be files in there which aren't owned by our package though, or > >modified. > Huh? > > I just meant make individual symlinks for a individual binaries. NOT a > symlink for the entire directory. Ahhh. Ok. I thought y

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-06-08T07:15:01, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really > >>>needs those files there. > >>Could we symlink 'em somewhere? > >Yes, I think that is a good solution (short of rearanging the > >resource paths completely). I

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

2006-06-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-06-08T08:21:38, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Please fix it everywhere, if you don't mind. > >> > >>Thanks Horms!! > >Of course, special attention needs to be paid to upgrading to (and > >possibly, back off from) a version with that change. > > I'm pretty sure that RPM