Hi,
This bug blocks migration to testing for gtimelog.
Looking for related issues I saw 1073382 which was filed a few months
separate to this and was shortly after marked as having the package
rebuildable - has this build been retested ? It would be a pity for
gtimelog not to make it due to a
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, 06:38:32 EST, Luca Capello wrote:
posting mobile, hopefully i didnt trim anything vital out.
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:06:52 +0200, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 May 2012 15:16:36 +0200
> > Luca Capello wrote:
> fixed in squeeze-proposed-updates wi
anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=commit;h=47fbab2da0062f2d4df087496220d969dd755d7b>
>
> Thx, bye,
> Gismo / Luca
Thanks everyone for your work on this, sorry I didn't take part in the
discussion last month.
thanks,
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS)
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
*** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 ***
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 14:50:52 +0100
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi kibi,
> Karl Goetz (25/01/2012):
> > #This really deserves a higher severity as a potential dfsg
> > violation. severity 645807 serious
> > thanks
>
> Basic research like checking debian/copyright really w
Package: bacula
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG violation
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
Hi,
The sha1 implimentation shipped in stable and oldstable appears to be
taken directly from the RFC, with dfsg incompatible licence statements.
The affected files are s
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:57:24 +0100
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Karl Goetz
> wrote:
> > >From [1], it seems the pdf-transcoder.jar in batik contains a
> > >colour
> > profile with a crazy licence.
> > "...permission to u
ernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS)
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
g/bugs/?34579
thanks,
kk
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /b
/DFSGLicenses#CreativeCommonsAttributionShare-Alike.28CC-BY-SA.29v3.0
thanks,
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 09:36:08 +1030
Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:28:41 +0100
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 13:38:58 +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
>
> > > visualboyadvance in debian contains a file which lacks commercial
> > >
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:28:41 +0100
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 13:38:58 +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > visualboyadvance in debian contains a file which lacks commercial
> > distribution rights [1]. Since this isn't granted by default, we
> I guess wors
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:28:41 +0100
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 13:38:58 +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > visualboyadvance in debian contains a file which lacks commercial
> > distribution rights [1]. Since this isn't granted by default, we
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:28:41 +0100
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 13:38:58 +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > visualboyadvance in debian contains a file which lacks commercial
> > distribution rights [1]. Since this isn't granted by default, we
> > need
Package: visualboyadvance
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: non commercial licence, not allowed in main
User: k...@kgoetz.id.au
Usertags: libreplanet
Hi,
visualboyadvance in debian contains a file which lacks commercial distribution
rights [1]. Since this isn't granted by default, w
it only in accordance with the terms of the license agreement
* you entered into with Sun.
*/
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236309
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519466
Please make a dfsg free version of the package.
thanks,
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser
before was ~11%.
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tag 562492 + patch
thanks
Lets see if i get it right this time.
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Tags: patch
I'm not a member of the team, so I won't be able to commit this
directly.
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
diff --git a/debian/control b/debia
been closed by Jan Dittberner .
>
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Jan Dittberner
> by replying to this email.
Thanks for your
Package: linux-2.6
Version: linux-2.6-2.6.32~rc8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hi,
Severity serious since all files must have their source.
The following files seem to have been generated from a file which is not in
the Linux source tree.
./arch/arm/mach-integrator/include/mach/b
Package: linux-2.6
Version: linux-2.6-2.6.32~rc8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hi,
./arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/sv_addr.agh appears to be generated from
another file, which is not in the Linux source tree.
Ref: http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00323
Ref: http://lists.gnu.org/ar
Package: dosbox
Version: 0.73
Severity: serious
Hi,
First: ymf262.c has no licence statement, so its not clear if its distributable.
Second: In #530824 theres issue with fmopl.c(.h) and the possability of MAME
code being copied. According to the reporter in [1] the same problem could be
applicable
licence grant:
./ippd/md4.{c,h}
radius.c
These have no grant of redistribution:
./ipppd/md5.{c,h}
... and I stopped looking here. I assume other directories are equally
affected.
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
Package: isdnutils
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hi,
At least one file this package are GPL incompatible.
./eurofile/src/wuauth/sigfix.c bans monetary gain.
(see also eurofile/COPYING.authlib )
Thanks,
kk
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT po
ow it anyway"? Anyway, probably not
> relevant to gNewSense.
I assume this is a DFSG/policy exception (similar to the requirement of
all changes being distributed as diffs).
TBH, I'd prefer the 'changes as diffs' approach over 'rename on
change', but thats just me being a pain.
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
25 matches
Mail list logo
