* Michael Jeanson wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Here is an updated debdiff, it works on a fully updated jessie. Should
> we track these updates in a branch of the collab-maint repo?
Excellent, thanks. This patch works and I've put it into a dedicated
stable branch 'jessie' so this will be easier to trac
* Michael Jeanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build
> failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload.
Hey Michael,
I just attempted a build with your diff and I'm seeing the attached
errors. It looks like the debian-specific ifdefs are not quite right,
* Michael Jeanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build
> failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload.
Thanks Michael, I'm traveling this week and next, I'll try to get to
this as soon as I can but it may be a week or two before I have adequate
time. NM
* Ivo De Decker wrote:
> package: ust
> severity: serious
> version: 2.5.1-1
>
> Hi,
>
> The latest upload of ust fails on most architectures, but built fine in the
> past. This prevents migration to testing.
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ust
Thanks, this is my fault and n
- Forwarded message from Jon Bernard -
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:42:49 -0400
From: Jon Bernard
To: Debian FTP Masters
Subject: Re: udt_4.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
* Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
> udt_4.11+dfsg.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the poo
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This patch replaces HOST_NAME_MAX by xgethostname() which is a wrapper
> around malloc() + gethostname() to get a large enough buffer to fit the
> hostname.
> xgethostname.c was stolen from coreutils and slightly changed so it
> works without xreallocte().
>
>
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> tags 751336 + patch upstream fixed-upstream
> thanks.
>
> On 2014-06-11 22:29:48 [+0200], Julien Cristau wrote:
> > See the build log at
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=babeltrace&arch=armel&ver=1.2.1-2&stamp=1395846913
> >
> > There's also
* Julien Cristau wrote:
> Source: ltt-control
> Version: 2.4.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Hi,
>
> your package no longer builds on the armel buildds:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ltt-control&arch=armel&ver=2.4.1-1&stamp=1397064419
T
* Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Source: ust
> Version: 2.4.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> ust FTBFS on some architectures:
> | dh build-arch
> |dh_testdir -a
> |debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure
> | make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
> | dh_a
* Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
> (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
> slightly out of sync):
>
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblttng-ust-fork.so.0
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblttng-ust-fork.so.0.0.0
> /
* Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Package: lttng-modules-dkms
> Version: 2.3.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #723850
>
> Hi!
>
> I have added this at the end of the dkms file to solve this issue:
>
> if [ "$KCONFIG" = "true" ] && [ -n "$CONFIG_KPROBES" ]; then
>BUILT_MODULE_NAME[$i]="lttng-kretprobes"
>
notfound 688779 liburcu/0.7.4-1
found 688779 ltt-control/2.1.0~rc4-1
thanks
--
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
* Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:04:59PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Package: liburcu1
> > Version: 0.7.4-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 8.6
>
> This is a bug report against liburcu/0.7.4-1 but you seem to have closed
> it in an ltt-control upload. If
* Petr Salinger wrote:
> Package: babeltrace
> Version: 1.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> Hi,
>
> the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
>
> The value ENODATA is linux specific,
> please use some general error num
* Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:47:19PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote:
> >
> > I suspect the buildd (schroeder in this case) has a 32bit userland and thus
> > has
> > a HOSTTYPE of "sparc" instead of "sparc64". I should be a
* Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Package: liburcu
> Version: 0.7.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package seems to be marked Architecture: any but seems to FTBFS on
> multiple architectures, some of them even release architectures. mipsel
> has already been marked as Not-For-Us.
>
> One of t
* Glenn McGrath wrote:
> The previous fix was fro the debian files in ust-2.1.1 source package, then
> you can rebuild ltt-control (unchanged) and all the debs install.
Yep, you're right. UST's install file is incorrect. I'm not sure how this one
slipped by me, I test the install prior to upload
* Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> 3 would have been in lieu of 2, which is in retrospect a better choice in this
> case, and will give you the opportunity to tighten liblttng-ctl0's own shlibs
> while you're at it. Please take care to have ltt-control build-depend on
> a version of liburcu-dev with this fi
* Jon Bernard wrote:
> * Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Jon Bernard writes:
> >
> > > Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source
> > > to
> > > find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the
>
* Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Jon Bernard writes:
>
> > Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source to
> > find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the
> > symbols file? - or is that how it's done?
>
> You
* Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Package: liburcu1
> Version: 0.7.4-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 8.6
>
> lttng-tools's postinst fails on my system, which still has liburcu1
> 0.6.7-2 (from testing), demonstrating that liblttng-ctl0 needs a
> versioned dependency on liburcu1. I would say
* Michael Lundkvist wrote:
> Package: lttng-tools
> Version: 2.1.0~rc3-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I just tried installing lttng-tools, but the installation hangs when trying
> to start lttng-sessiond.
>
> It seems like the init script f
* gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:11:34 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote:
>
> > > I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and
> > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > > should delay it longer.
> > Woul
* gregor herrmann wrote:
> tags 652252 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Would you mind delaying this one day longer? I'm right now working o
* Julien Cristau wrote:
> found 637636 0.15-2
> kthxbye
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 15:10:35 +, Jon Bernard wrote:
>
> > ust (0.15-2) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* [0fb2d5c] Update liburcu version dependency (Closes: #637636)
>
> So you cha
* Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, MT wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I installed cgroup-bin on my system (Ubuntu 10.10, kernel 2.6.36), and
> > experienced similar problems as the original bug reporter, so I'm
> > reopening this bug. My system would suspend fine, but would not be able
>
* Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:52:00 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote:
>
> > diff -Nru ust-0.5/debian/changelog ust-0.5/debian/changelog
> > --- ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-07-02 11:34:52.0 -0400
> > +++ ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-
* Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:13:22PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote:
> > * Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > > > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
&
* Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> > that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well.
> >
> > > Julien Cristau writes:
> > | Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.r
* Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> > that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well.
> >
> > > Julien Cristau writes:
> > | Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.r
* jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Here is the NMU diff according to DevRef 5.11.1[1][2] for bug: #598309.
> See the debian/patches directory for the important fixes.
Excellent, thank you.
> Please let me know if it's ok to proceed with the NMU.
Yes, please do so. Upstream
tags 555711 moreinfo unreproducible
stop
I have had a chance to test this on a machine that suspends and
everything works fine for me, I cannot reproduce this bug at the moment.
I have pinged the submitter a few times with no response. Without
additional information (a configuration file at the l
* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> unarchive 549480
> found 549480 0.34-2
> thanks
>
> >* Fix initscript dependencies (Closes: #549480) - thanks to Petter
> > Reinholdtsen
>
> The implemented patch created new problems. The archive wide check of
> init.d script dependencies report:
>
>
* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> unarchive 549480
> found 549480 0.34-2
> thanks
>
> >* Fix initscript dependencies (Closes: #549480) - thanks to Petter
> > Reinholdtsen
>
> The implemented patch created new problems. The archive wide check of
> init.d script dependencies report:
>
>
* Guido Trotter wrote:
> Package: cgroup-bin
> Version: 0.34-2
> Severity: critical
>
> Hi,
Hi Guido, thanks for the bug report.
> I installed cgroup-bin on my system, and when its system services
> (cgconfig and cgred) are started my system cannot suspend, hibernate
> just hangs. After that ev
Oops!, here's the patch
--
Jon
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index d0658d7..b0a1e37 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ install/rubygems1.9.1::
mv $(CURDIR)/debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/lib/* $(CURDIR)/debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/$(RUBY19LIBDIR)/
rm $(CURDIR)/debian/$
tags 549778 patch
Attached is a patch that fixes this. Ubuntu has just applied and
uploaded it, see:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgems-ruby/+bug/447677
--
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
It occurred to me that debian packages should not modify the original
upstream source directly. I'll work up a patch that uses dpatch and post
it here soon. I'll ping Tom (the upstream author) on this issue as well.
--
Jon Bernard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
tags 470863 + patch
Hey LJ, attached is a diff that should take care of #470863. I'll be
happy to NMU this if you like, your call, just let me know.
--
Jon Bernard
diff --git a/feh.1 b/feh.1
index 254949e..e56b46a 100644
--- a/feh.1
+++ b/feh.1
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ it, or will fall back
39 matches
Mail list logo
