On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:10:44PM -0700, John Wenger wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:45:55PM -0700, John Wenger wrote:
> >
> > I used apt-cache
postfix or the lenny maintainers?
All I did was install postfix. I had not even gotten around to configuring
it. Now that mutt is working locally, I have something to test with.
HTH.
John Wenger
only? Anyhow, that is what someone named
Rado said in a forum about this mutt problem?
John Wenger
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.028stab064.7 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:45:55PM -0700, John Wenger wrote:
> > I have used djbdns off and on for years (woody, sarge, and before) but
> > I was never able to get it to work using the debian way. Everyone
> > said just
Package: dbndns
Version: 1:1.05-4+lenny1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have used djbdns off and on for years (woody, sarge, and before) but I was
never able to get it to work using the debian way. Everyone said just use
DJB's method, and it worked as a charm. Now, y
Package: evolution
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-03
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (char
6 matches
Mail list logo
