Bug#273871: libsilc package policy violations (bug #273871)

2005-04-20 Thread Jeff Carr
Steve Langasek wrote: 4) the package itself is not the right name 4) is an approximation, but not actually a correct description (it's the same incorrect approximation used by Policy itself). The problem is that the package name is not being changed when the library soname changes, which means tha

Bug#273871: libsilc package policy violations (bug #273871)

2005-04-20 Thread Jeff Carr
Robert McQueen wrote: Tamas SZERB wrote: once upon a time, I closed this bug. then the submitter reopened it, so currently I don't give it a f*ck. Our opinion are different, so if you feel any ambition to get the both sides together, feel free to volunteer. :) This package's violation of Debian po