Hi
Sorry for the delay. I will test and patch it tonight.
On 2/21/07, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# I think dvipdfmx should not be released non-working in some parts of
# the world
severity 403323 serious
tags 403323 patch
thanks
Jin-Hwan Cho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 15,
Hi
Did you use the wbx.mb? Could you try regenerate the wbx.mb on
powerbook using "mb2txt" and "txt2mb" commands?
On 2/7/07, Bin Tian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fcitx on debian amd64 is ok.
Bin Tian wrote:
I checked the bugs list of fcitx. The removal of ~/.fcitx directory which
menti
Hi
I am in business travel now. :( That bug is cause by the Chinese
fonts name changes of tfm-arphic-*. The font names in debian-zh-faq
source need be modified. Anyway, it can't be fixed until next week,
have to wait I back.
Yu Guanghui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi
It's caused by latex-cjk fonts name changes. I will update
debian-zh-faq as soon as possible.
Yu Guanghui
On 11/9/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
reassign 397655 debiandoc-sgml
merge 397655 397658
thanks
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi
It's not a bug. Please read Readme.Debian, fcitx 3.4 has changed
some data structs, you must remove ~/.fcitx directory.
Yu Gunaghui
On 10/13/06, gulfstream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: fcitx
Version: 1:3.4-1
Severity: g
Hi
I will add a test for /usr/bin/mktexlsr in postrm and other scripts,
if mktexlsr doesn't exist, it will not be executed.
On 8/28/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: dvipdfmx
Version: 1:20050831-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It appe
Hi
I didn't fix Bug#379589 because rsjog can't work with
libgnome2-ruby (Bug#368513). I'm working on 368513, but I haven't the
Sony Notebook to test now, my new notebook is Thinkpad. So I'm not
sure whether it can be fixed.
Yu Guanghui
Hi I think so. It should useless for next release.On 3/14/06, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Since this package served its purpose for upgrades to sarge, can it beremoved?
Thanks,Matej
Ok, I will check it tonight. I has remembered I modified the scirpt
before. It seems I forget to modify qpopper-drac.
On 6/15/05, Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Yu,
>
> > It's not a bug. If there is already /var/spool/pop, its grou
It's not a bug. If there is already /var/spool/pop, its group owner
should be mail and has permission 2755, excepting it was wrong
modified by other programs.
On 6/14/05, Tashiro AKIRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: qpopper-drac
> Version: 4.0.5-4sarge1
> Severity: critical
>
> After I ins
10 matches
Mail list logo
