On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:35:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm the maintainer in Debian for strace. Trying to reproduce
> https://bugs.debian.org/963462 on my machine (Thinkpad T470), I've
> found a repeatable hard lockup running the strace testsuite. Each time
> it seems to h
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:05:42PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Jan, hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:58:06PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > commit 310ca162d77 "block/loop: Use global lock for ioctl() operation." has
> > been pushed to multiple stable trees. This patc
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:10:59PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 14:05 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:03:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Thu,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:03:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 security upstream patch moreinfo
> > > Control: severity -1 gr
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 security upstream patch moreinfo
> > Control: severity -1 grave
> > Control: found -1 3.14.5-1
>
> Aurelien Jarno pointed out this appears to be fixed upstre
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 09:55:47AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:47:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On S
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:47:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > This was commit 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf.
> > now queued u
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This was commit 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf.
now queued up.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 03:00:38PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> GK> /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices
> That doesn't work either. And also one can only paste it into the tiny
> window, not from the command line, and there is no mention about
> configuration files, or even the tiny window, on the
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 03:10:10AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> found 451191 1.1-1
> severity 451191 grave
> thanks
> So first I notice that it no just pops up a message saying that (the
> stuff is no longer in /proc). Then I notice there is no command line
> option to give it a new location
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 05:31:50PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.32-9-sb1-bcm91250a
> > Version: 2.6.32-5
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: patch fixed-upstream
> >
> > Swarm will hang during boot and all you see is:
> >
> > |[0
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:23:26AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> The handling of ethernet devices seems to be unusual in that there are
> entries for them in /sys but not, as far as I can tell, in /dev (by
> default, anyway).
That's the Unix way, network devices never show up in /dev. This has
noth
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:15:16PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> For modules, you need to know what you are doing. Unfortunately the
> kernel developers seem to be ignorant WRT such things, "gcc" is
> hardcoded in assumption of beeing a never changing compatibility
> constant.
Perhaps you could en
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:23:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > > Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3
> > > (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have
> > > gc
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:15:35AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:49:22AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > >
> > > Am I understanding you correctly when I read it as saying that kernel
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
>
> Am I understanding you correctly when I read it as saying that kernel 2.6.12
> (a point release in the "stable" branch)
There is no more "stable" or "development" kernel branches anymore,
haven't been for quite some time. So this st
16 matches
Mail list logo
