Bug#942737: libapache2-mod-gnutls: mod_gnutls consumes 100% cpu

2023-02-24 Thread Félix Arreola Rodríguez
come back directly to stable, because it is pretty much needed. [1] https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/mod_gnutls-devel/2023-February/000221.html El dom, 5 jun 2022 a la(s) 15:04, Félix Arreola Rodríguez ( fgatuno@gmail.com) escribió: > Finally managed to write a patch. This patch applies ok

Bug#942737: libapache2-mod-gnutls: mod_gnutls consumes 100% cpu

2022-06-05 Thread Félix Arreola Rodríguez
Finally managed to write a patch. This patch applies ok on mod-gnutls 0.9.0 and not sure if it will work for buster. -- Atte. Félix Arreola Firmado con GPG 0x1e249ee4 Author: Félix Arreola Rodríguez Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2022 10:42:46 -0500 Subject: Fix a loop caused by timeout if mod_reqtimeout is

Bug#942737: libapache2-mod-gnutls: mod_gnutls consumes 100% cpu

2020-11-28 Thread Félix Arreola Rodríguez
Tags 942737 security thanks -- Atte. Félix Arreola Firmado con GPG 0x1e249ee4 pgppIF_bZVjam.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP

Bug#942737: libapache2-mod-gnutls: mod_gnutls consumes 100% cpu

2020-11-28 Thread Félix Arreola Rodríguez
Now I think this bug, this could be used as DOS, should we call the security team to handle this? -- Atte. Félix Arreola Firmado con GPG 0x1e249ee4 pgprkMFhW5CS_.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP

Bug#942737: libapache2-mod-gnutls: mod_gnutls consumes 100% cpu

2020-11-28 Thread Félix Arreola Rodríguez
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 02:37:50 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_=c3=9cbelacker?= wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > tried to reconstruct the given backtrace with debug symbols > in a gdb session and came to following, maybe it could be > of some help. > (Still a proper backtrace with dbgsym packages > installed wo