Please go ahead and NMU.
Emilien
Le sam. 26 janv. 2019 à 15:18, Bruno Kleinert a écrit :
> Hi Emilien,
>
> please consider addressing this RC bug.
>
> Just to raise awareness: I plan to NMU with my previously attached
> patch around week 7.
>
> Cheers - Bruno
>
Hi Georges,
Do you have any time to look into this?
I have also created a bug report at
https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/650 to see if any of the upstream
developers are motivated to take this over.
Best,
Emilien
ᐧ
Emilien
2016-08-06 0:05 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtsen :
> Hi.
>
> Any
> Unblock request sent to the Release team, see bug #773113.
The unblock request was approved.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Unblock request sent to the Release team, see bug #773113.
+Emilien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
TLDR: Please check if the "/var/lib/tomcat8/shared" folder is still used
with Tomcat 8.
I have applied the previously attached patch, the package builds fine,
but when installing the .deb the following error occurs:
Setting up biomaj-watcher (1.2.2-2) ...
Updating Context.xml...
Configuration co
Package: shaarli
Version: 0.0.42~beta~dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
After installing shaarli from Testing on a new machine, a 500 Internal Server
Error is logged when accessing the page for the first time.
>From /var/log/nginx/error.log:
2014/12/13 14:39:27 [error] 101
FYI: I have removed the "jessie" tag, as
- the Jessie Freeze policy in effect (i.e. not reasonable to have the
new upstream version 1.1.0-1 that's in Git be included in Jessie)
- the package is already removed from Testing (on 2014-07-18)
Cheers,
+Emilien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi team, read below for an important announcement regarding the GNU
Health package in Debian.
2014-06-02 23:28 GMT+02:00 Emilien Klein :
> Piuparts identified this bug in March, and I haven't taken the time to
> fully address the issue that only happens in certain locales it seems
Per "chance" I'm just stumbling on bug #748561 (I unsubscribed from
debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org due to volume a while
ago, seems like I should reconsider).
Piuparts identified this bug in March, and I haven't taken the time to
fully address the issue that only happens in certain l
Hi Andreas and the python-nautilus maintainer,
I have just installed nautilus-image-manipulator in a fresh Sid
installation (came with nautilus and python-nautilus as dependencies)
and I didn't have any issues of any kind running nautilus and the extension.
I assume this bug was indeed fixed with
I have been granted upload rights for Shaarli by Georges, and have
uploaded the package to ftp-master.
Should anything in particular be done (e.g. pushing directly to
testing?) or does this follow the regular upload process?
+Emilien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.d
Hi David, Salvatore and Georges,
2014-04-01 20:24 GMT+02:00 Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:38:55PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>> Package: shaarli
>> Version: 0.0.41~beta~dfsg2-3
>> Severity: grave
>> Tags: security patch upstream
>> Control: forward -1 https://github.c
I am fine with your NMU. Thanks for taking care of it.
No need to delay more if you want.
+Emilien
2014-04-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Luca Falavigna :
> tags 742805 + patch pending
> thanks
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for nautilus-image-manipulator (versioned as 1.3-1.1) and
> upl
Hi team,
I have made the switch to use su instead of sudo [0].
Please upload gnuhealth 2.4.1-2 to unstable.
On 02/24/2014 01:57 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> I am also open to use su instead of sudo. That's even what I first
>> did, but (for some reason I can't remember) didn't get the command to
>
Hi Mentors,
TLDR: in order to execute a command as another user, should `sudo` or
`su --command` be used?
I'd like to get your opinion on how to best solve this issue:
I've got a package [0] that uses dbconfig-common to manage its
database. The database is owned by a specific user (not root).
I
Hi Andreas,
Le 23 févr. 2014 22:30, "Andreas Tille" a écrit :
>
> Hi Emilien,
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:49:46PM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
> > 2014-02-23 19:53 GMT+01:00 Karsten Hilbert :
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 08:38:56AM +0100
I assumed/believed sudo was part of the "base" Debian system, as I don't
have issues when building the package with pbuilder.
I indeed want to execute those commands as the user that owns the database.
I understood sudo (su DO) was meant to execute commands as another user,
while su is used to "be
Le 21 févr. 2014 21:57, "Emilien Klein" a écrit :
>
> This is already weird:
>
> populating database via scriptfile... error encountered populating
database: /usr/share/dbconfig-common/scripts/gnuhealth-server/install/pgsql
exited with non-zero status
>
> Might be
Next to zach's workaround of using monkeysign (which worked for 14 of the
16 keys I had to sign [0] [1]), another possibility is to downgrade gnupg:
# apt-get install gnupg/stable
(credit to odyx@d.o who suggested this to me privately)
Thanks for maintaining signing-party.
+Emilien
[0] http:/
Hi Sebastian,
2013/6/1 Sebastian Ramacher :
> Hi Emilien,
>
> On 2013-03-03 18:33:48, Emilien Klein wrote:
>> Is there someone on the Python Apps Team that would be willing to
>> upload the NMU I prepared? It's uploaded to mentors.d.n [0]?
>>
>>+Em
Hi Marco,
2013/3/1 Marco Rodrigues :
> Which e-mail did you try to contact me? goth...@sapo.pt? That one I really
> don't check it =(
No problem, most important is that we got in touch at last.
> I'm not so active lately unfortunately, but I'm glad you want to help to
> maintain it. You can perh
Package: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version: 1.1-1.1
Severity: grave
1fichier.com, the file locker to which Nautilus Image Manipulator can
send files after having resized them, has changed the server to which
files are to be POSTed. which breaks the application. No useful error
message is displaye
Package: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version: 1.1-1.1
Severity: grave
If the configuration file has been edited manually, it will not be
possible to start Nautilus Image Manipulator afterwards.
Reason is that the width and height parameters will be floats, but N
I M will assume they are integers,
Hi Marco Rodrigues and the Python Applications Packaging Team,
The subdownloader package you co-maintain has a grave bug [0] which
resulted in the package being removed from Testing more than 2 years
ago.
This bug has been fixed in version 2.0.18 (4 releases later than
2.0.14 packaged in Debian).
I'll gladly take care of the Debian packaging
Thanks,
+Emilien
[0] http://mentors.debian.net/package/subdownloader
2012/11/23 Emilien Klein :
> Hi Python Applications Packaging Team and Marco Rodrigues,
>
> Please have a look at the patch I sent to fix this "Severity: g
Hi Andre,
2012/11/24 Andre Verwijs :
> RE x-terminal-emulator as default term breaks nautilus-open-terminal
>
> the problem stil exists, how do i fix it ?
Not sure what you mean by "the problem". Can you have a look at bug
#693894 and tell me if that's related?
According to the latest message fro
Hi Python Applications Packaging Team and Marco Rodrigues,
Please have a look at the patch I sent to fix this "Severity: grave"
bug which caused the removal of SubDownloader from the archive.
As mentioned in my previous mail, I've prepared a NMU [0] for this, it
would be nice if you could check it
Hi,
The following patch (already applied upstream [0]) fixes this bug.
I've prepared a NMU (versioned as 2.0.14-1.1) and uploaded it to
mentors.d.n [1], please review and upload.
Thanks,
+Emilien
[0]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~subdownloader-developers/subdownloader/trunk/revision/552
[1]
reassign 684836 python-distutils-extra
merge 682631 684836
affects 682631 nautilus-image-manipulator
thanks
This is similar to bug #682634, which most probably finds its cause in
python-distutils-extra
Cheers,
+Emilien
P.S.: this is the first time I'm reassigning and merging bugs, let me
know
2012/6/27 Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> I can cancel the NMU if you would like to upload yourself, this would be
> perfect! It's still time do to so[1].
I just checked the patch and everything is fine. I'm OK with you doing the NMU.
> Btw, I had some warnings on build:
>
>> WARNING: syntax errors in
Hi Salvatore,
2012/6/26 Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> tags 676045 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for nautilus-image-manipulator (versioned as 1.1-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
T
While wanting to package a new version of nautilus-image-manipulator
in Sid I encountered the same crash as reported by Andrea Veri.
With both nautilus-python 1.1-1 and nautilus-image-manipulator 0.4-1
installed, this is the output of `aptitude dist-upgrade` as of today:
Les paquets suivants ont
Just released version 0.4 that contains the transition to nautilus 3
and GObject introspection. I'm getting to work on packaging it!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
33 matches
Mail list logo
