Bug#980645: leiningen-clojure: FTBFS: Cannot access central (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/) in offline mode and the artifact org.slf4j:slf4j-nop:jar:1.7.25 has not been downloaded from it before.

2021-01-20 Thread Elana Hashman
On 2021-01-20 12:58, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: leiningen-clojure Version: 2.9.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant pa

Bug#973094: leiningen-clojure: FTBFS: Cannot access central (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/) in offline mode and the artifact commons-io:commons-io:jar:2.6 has not been downloaded from it before.

2020-10-27 Thread Elana Hashman
Thanks for the report. Looks like libcommons-io-java has been updated to 2.8.0.[1] We'll need to patch both the Debian build and send a PR upstream to get it on the newer version. - e [1]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/libcommons-io-java signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#970717: kubernetes: abuse of "embedded code copies" | hundreds of vendored libraries

2020-09-22 Thread Elana Hashman
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:56:25PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > As discussed in debian-devel, Kubernetes package abuses Debian practices > and Golang team policies by needlessly vendoring hundreds(!) of libraries, > most of which are available in Debian. > > For a complex package like Kubern

Bug#900299: leiningen-clojure: depends on openjdk-8

2019-02-24 Thread Elana Hashman
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 06:34:53PM -0500, Elana Hashman wrote: > So this weekend I am going to look into changing the build to more > closely match upstream, now that we've bootstrapped a working > Leiningen into the archive. This would involve building Leiningen with > a pr

Bug#923164: leiningen-clojure: FTBFS (Could not resolve dependencies for project leiningen-core:leiningen-core:jar:2.8.1)

2019-02-24 Thread Elana Hashman
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 04:31:08PM +, Santiago Vila wrote: > > I tried to build this package in buster but it failed: > > > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > [INFO] > [INFO] ---< leiningen-core:l

Bug#900299: leiningen-clojure: depends on openjdk-8

2019-02-23 Thread Elana Hashman
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > > It looks like it's been fixed in newer versions of Clojure, but we > haven't bumped that in Leiningen yet. Note that this has been fixed upstream in the 2.9.0 release. I've been trying to upgrade Leiningen in Debian to this new r

Bug#900299: leiningen-clojure: depends on openjdk-8

2019-01-21 Thread Elana Hashman
On 2019-01-21 14:49, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: We can only support one OpenJDK relase in a stable release and that version will be openjdk-11. I'm bumping the severity back to serious. Cheers, Moritz So here's the issue with Leiningen and Java 11. We previously tracked down some sor

Bug#912261: clojure: FTBFS with Java 11 due to overloaded Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-06 Thread Elana Hashman
The patch to fix this was already applied to clojure1.8. I just need to do it for 1.9. I've been sick all weekend or else this'd be done already. Now instead I am drowning in AUTORM emails :'( Cheers, - e signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#900299: leiningen-clojure: depends on openjdk-8

2018-06-04 Thread Elana Hashman
Hi Emilio, Why was this bug filed as serious? Leiningen has a direct dependency on Java 8 and upstream has not yet been updated to use a newer version of Java, as the public Java 11 builds aren't really available yet. I had to pin the build to Java 8 as it does not work properly with Java 9+ yet.

Bug#889533: leiningen-clojure build dependencies need 1.8 adjustments

2018-02-22 Thread Elana Hashman
Thanks for reopening this! Not sure why the clojure1.8 changelog marked it as done, as it specified the issues were only partially addressed. I will be uploading all the bd fixes for leiningen and its multitude of dependencies in the next day or two :) - e signature.asc Description: Digital sign

Bug#889533: leiningen-clojure FTBFS with libclojure-java 1.9.0~alpha15-1

2018-02-11 Thread Elana Hashman
Control: tags sid Hi Adrian! Thanks for your report. The Clojure Team was aware of this bug but has not yet fixed it. Leiningen is not compatible with Clojure >1.8 as a build dependency. This is why I blocked the new Clojure 1.9 alpha from migrating to testing (#887382). Hence, this bug doesn't

Bug#887382: prevent Clojure 1.9.0 alpha from migrating to testing

2018-01-15 Thread Elana Hashman
Package: clojure Version: 1.9.0~alpha15-1 Severity: serious This alpha version of Clojure 1.9.0 was uploaded to facilitate packaging the official 1.9.0 release. As such, I need to prevent it from migrating to testing for now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#862602: libcore-cache-clojure: Package is missing a dependency

2017-05-14 Thread Elana Hashman
Package: libcore-cache-clojure Version: 0.6.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Control: block -1 by 855722 Hello! While working on packaging libstencil-clojure, I noticed that the dependency org.clojure/data.priority-map was missing, and traced it down to this package:

Bug#862272: libpomegranate-clojure lost all dependencies

2017-05-11 Thread Elana Hashman
On 2017-05-10 10:14, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: libpomegranate-clojure Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious libpomegranate-clojure 0.2.0-1 has: Depends: libaether-java, libdynapath-clojure, libwagon-java, libwagon2-java, maven libpomegranate-clojure 0.3.1-1 has no dependencies at all. Hi Adria

Bug#862233: libpomegranate-clojure: Package does not work with available version of maven

2017-05-09 Thread Elana Hashman
Package: libpomegranate-clojure Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Control: block 819811 by -1 libpomegranate-clojure 0.2.0 and 0.3.1 depend on Maven 3.0.4. However, only 3.3.9 is available in stretch and sid. When I attempt to use the package, I get a ClassN