Hi Paul, Martin,
(CC ktetzlaff, see below)
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Context: dhcpcd-base has taken over DHCP duties from isc-dhcp-client in
> > ustable via priority override at Martin's request. This changes a Debian
> > installs DHCP behaviour in a number o
Hi release team,
Martin and me are having a disagreement on what constitutes an RC bug. I
was wondering if you could give us your view of the matter. Since I'm not
sure you usually deal with these sorts of things "Go ask TC" is ofc. a
perfectly valid response I just thought perhaps we're not quite
Hi Crhis,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 02:19:40PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 06:06:32PM +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > dhcpcd-base does not send the system's hostname by default as
> > isc-dhcp-client used to due to /etc/dhcpcd.conf having the `
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 08:36:05PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Please see recently closed bugs. Someone recently requested the same
> thing. Upstream insists on shipping that option commented out because he
> feels that exposing the hostname is a privacy issue.
It was already ar
Package: dhcpcd-base
Version: 1:10.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks network rechability, thus making unrelated software on
system break (per rc_policy.txt).
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@darkboxed.org
Hi Martin,
dhcpcd-base does not send the system's hostname by default as
isc-dhcp-client used
Hi Tarkik, Hi Larry,
I think I've finally found the issue and uploaded 0.33-6~exp3 to confirm.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 12:11:21PM +0200, Tarik Graba wrote:
> This bug seems to be related to an old version of the upstream source.
> Is it still present on newer releases?
The issue is still present
Hi Matthias,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:16:56PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:yosys-plugin-ghdl
> * Use ghdl-mcode instead of ghdl-gcc as it's more portable
>
> but ghdl-mcode is only available on amd64 and i386. With this choice you're
> making things worse.
My bad, I was under
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:51:44PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ifupdown-ng
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Thanks Lucas, I'm uploading a fix right now.
> This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
> -Werror=
close 1042276 3.0.0+dfsg-1
thanks
We're now depending on g++-12 explicitly.
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 03:43:28PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: yosys
> Version: 0.33-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
>
> The full build log is available from:
> http://qa-log
Package: iproute2
Version: 6.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.2
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@darkboxed.org
Dear Maintainer,
your iproute2 6.5.0-3 package installs configuration files in
/usr/lib/iproute2. This is a blatant violation of debian-policy
section 10.7.2. "Configuration files /
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 08:49:38AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I notice the new upload of 0.18 already happened, which is very nice to
> see. But this bug was not closed in debian/changelog. Does this mean
> bug #1010964 is not solved?
>
> Also, remember to ask ftpmasters to remove any m
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and
> unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing
> [1]. Your package src:yosys has been trying to migrate for 61 days [2]
close 1004212 1.01+20211229git48498af+dfsg-2
thanks
Fixe by
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/berkeley-abc/-/commit/cf6ed6eb2ce4b9ea0494d4d145f8bc1a6d47d2f5
Thanks,
--Daniel
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the report.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 01:04:27AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=fpga-icestorm&arch=all
>
> ...
>debian/rules override_dh_install
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_install
> cd debian/fpga-icestorm/usr/share
Package: ola
Version: 0.9.8-1
Followup-For: Bug #815363
According to OLA's NEWS file the dependency on SLP was removed in
version 0.9.4: "Remove the SLP code since it's no longer required for
E1.33.".
I tried building the ola package after removing the depency on
libslp-dev and it seems to build
16 matches
Mail list logo
