Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

2015-02-04 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:54:41PM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: >On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

2015-02-04 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: >On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

2015-02-04 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: >If I read that correctly, #773412 fixed i386 on an i386 kernel. As you can >see in the dumps

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

2015-02-04 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:48:23PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: I'm not convinced that this doesn't break the use case in #773412 [1] since you're lo

Bug#776999: broken 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel

2015-02-04 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: Package: efivar Version: 0.15-3 Severity: serious I'm afraid the patch 07-num_bits.patch breaks the case of 32-bit userland on a 64-bit kernel. As far as I know, this is how i386 would get installed on any non-ancient machine if d-i

Bug#773726: efibootmgr: duplicate bootnum created

2014-12-22 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
Looks like this bug also needed this, which was already in 0.11.0-1: https://github.com/vathpela/efibootmgr/commit/301c0628f7fa7333791d2b5d79eb8e02fc848ee7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia

Bug#768889: tags jessie sid

2014-12-17 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
control: tags -1 + jessie control: tags -1 + sid -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#773007: tags jessie sid

2014-12-17 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
control: tags -1 + jessie control: tags -1 + sid -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#768880: tags jessie sid

2014-12-17 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
control: tags -1 + jessie control: tags -1 + sid -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#773007: Doesn't work on i386, crashes also

2014-12-15 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
Hrmph. There was a 32-bit issue in 0.9.0-1 that was supposed to be fixed in 0.9.0-2: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764797 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764796 Any chance you can test with efibootmgr from unstable? I've looked at the changes upstream and

Bug#768880: efibootmgr: unusable if reading any boot variable fails

2014-12-12 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
Jan, My apologies for not seeing this bug report earlier. I just noticed it this morning thanks to Bastien. I reviewed the patch. It looks like it should be fine for at least restoring previous behavior, so I passed it along to Peter Jones, the upstream maintainer, to see whether he concurs s

Bug#764386: libefivar0: Segmentation fault in vars_get_variable() (vars.c:165)

2014-11-03 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
Actually, never mind. Peter broke out your patch and applied it upstream. I've just uploaded efivar 0.15-2. Please verify that it works correctly on your system. On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:58:20AM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote: Jan, I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it.

Bug#764386: libefivar0: Segmentation fault in vars_get_variable() (vars.c:165)

2014-11-03 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
Jan, I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it. It'd probably help him to know more details about what system you're on, though, like what make/model this is and probably an strace if you can. --Jared -- Jared Domínguez Server OS Engineering Dell | Enterprise Solutions Grou

Bug#764386: libefivar0: Segmentation fault in vars_get_variable() (vars.c:165)

2014-10-29 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:14:59PM -0500, Jan Echternach wrote: Package: libefivar0 Version: 0.12-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Upgrading libefivar0 from version 0.10-5 to 0.12-1 causes a segmentation fault when running efibootmgr without arguments (I tried it with

Bug#764797: efibootmgr has multiple bugs in its 32bit version

2014-10-14 Thread D. Jared Dominguez
I just uploaded new efi{var,bootmgr} packages with these patches. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:30:21AM -0500, Michael Tokarev wrote: Package: efibootmgr Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious 32bit version (i386 package) of efibootmgr has several bugs which makes it unusable at least with large (>2Ti