I am unable to reproduce this problem any more
this only happens if AT gets upgraded after RT, still investigating...
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:39:38AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Package: rt4-extension-assettracker
> > Version: 2.0.0~b2-4
> > Severity: serious
> > User: de
Matthias Krüger wrote:
Package: razzle
Version: 970417-8
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
When I type "razzle" in a terminal and press enter it (the terminal) says:
"> svgalib: Cannot get I/O permissions."
and nothing more happens.
You'll get this message if you're running razz
severity 478664 normal
tags 478664 +wontfix
The only way to fix this would be to re-write xrootconsole, so if this
behavior is not acceptable, I recommend using root-tail instead.
-Brad
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated e
Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
I think it might be better to get rid of this unbuildable package than to
fix it. gtkmm2.0 has been superseded by gtkmm2.4. there are only 4 packages
using gtkmm2.0 anymore:
I have no problem with this.
-Brad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
ugfix.
+ * New upstream release with new soname (Closes: #330512, #349630, #315967)
+ * No longer build reference documentation, since it's included in tarball.
+ * Fix makefile so that docs/manual/html isn't deleted on clean.
+
+ -- Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 10 Jun 200
I have rebuilt and uploaded this package to comply with both the "c2"
and "c2a" transitions.
-brad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 340596 +pending
libgtkextra1.0-dev is still in the upload queue. Perhaps I should have waited
before uploading this one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That was entirely my fault, I shouldn't have uploaded this version to
unstable, as atk 1.9.x is still in experimental.
Is there any chance, Akira, that atk 1.9.x or its successor will be uploaded
to unstable very soon, or should I go ahead and force a downgrade of
libgtkmm?
-brad
> -Original
Joshua Kwan wrote:
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
Eager to make sure some of my work didn't somehow regress in the
transition from gtkmm 2.4 to 2.6, I tried to install the new libraries
out of incoming:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2
10 matches
Mail list logo
