On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Yes it does.
Thanks for testing.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu
wrote:
>My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after
>upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic:
Does this fix it:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/urgent
Thx.
--
Sent fr
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 04:00:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There's a typo in the subject line. :-)
Yep, looks like I've gradually gotten unnaccustomed to typing "amd" ...
it's not in the fingers anymore. :-)
Thanks, fixed.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk.
sudden a second channel appears.
Reported-and-tested-by: Roger Leigh
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov
---
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 8b6a0343c220..8b3d90143514
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:04:49AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is absolutely stable material. Most of the people affected are
> not going to work out that they plugged their memory in wrong. (And
> maybe some of them only have one module.)
Hmm, not from my experience. This is the first repo
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:24:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I've tested it against 3.10 and I can confirm that it works. I've
> booted the system with the DRAM on the same channel, and on
> separate channels, and it's working without problems in both cases.
That's good news, thanks for testing
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:19:26PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Ben's patch does allow me to boot the system with the memory in this
> configuration on a 3.10 kernel.
Ok, I actually think we can fix it the way below. It should be
equivalent to Ben's patch in current functionality with the differenc
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 06:41:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 09:54 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > If the bug is in amd64_edac_mod, there are only two possible commits
> > which could cause the problem:
> >
> > 1eef12825 amd64_edac: Correct DIMM sizes
> > 94c1acf2c amd64_ed
8 matches
Mail list logo
